Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 18: exact rank-three preparation from an EPR pair

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95.theorem18

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let λ=(λ1,…,λd)\lambda=(\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_d)λ=(λ1​,…,λd​) be a finite probability vector: every entry is nonnegative and the entries sum to one. Write ρλ=∑i,jλiλj∣ii⟩⟨jj∣\rho_\lambda=\sum_{i,j}\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}|ii\rangle\langle jj|ρλ​=∑i,j​λi​λj​​∣ii⟩⟨jj∣. All logarithms have base two. A PPT operation is a completely positive, trace-preserving map LLL such that ΓoutLΓin\Gamma_{\rm out}L\Gamma_{\rm in}Γout​LΓin​ is completely positive for arbitrary finite ancillary systems; Γ\GammaΓ transposes Bob in the fixed product basis. For a positive integer KKK, ΦK\Phi_KΦK​ denotes the maximally entangled state of Schmidt rank KKK. Assume that λ\lambdaλ has exactly three strictly positive entries, ordered as λ1↑≤λ2↑≤λ3↑\lambda_1^\uparrow\le\lambda_2^\uparrow\le\lambda_3^\uparrowλ1↑​≤λ2↑​≤λ3↑​. Then

Φ2→PPTρλ⟺2(λ3↑λ2↑+λ3↑λ1↑)+4λ1↑λ2↑≤1.\Phi_2\to^{\rm PPT}\rho_\lambda\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad2\bigl(\sqrt{\lambda_3^\uparrow\lambda_2^\uparrow}+\sqrt{\lambda_3^\uparrow\lambda_1^\uparrow}\bigr)+4\sqrt{\lambda_1^\uparrow\lambda_2^\uparrow}\le1.Φ2​→PPTρλ​⟺2(λ3↑​λ2↑​​+λ3↑​λ1↑​​)+4λ1↑​λ2↑​​≤1.

This is the exact rank-three preparation criterion from one EPR pair.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P95
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexOrder

open Filter

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

-- Exact primitives from the pinned accepted library; no local aliases.

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Claimed50.P28 (maximallyEntangledDensity)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P27 (IsProbability)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P63 (logTwo)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P19 (outer)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P18 (bipartiteTensor)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P11 (Loewner)

/-- PDF p.8, Theorem 18, (47): ordered Schmidt probabilities, coefficients 2,2,4. -/
theorem theorem18 (lam : Fin 3 → ℝ) (hprob : IsProbability lam)
    (hpos : ∀ i, 0 < lam i) (hsorted : Monotone lam) :
    Reach (maximallyEntangledDensity 2) (schmidtDensity lam) ↔
      2 * (Real.sqrt (lam 2 * lam 1) + Real.sqrt (lam 2 * lam 0)) +
        4 * Real.sqrt (lam 0 * lam 1) ≤ 1 := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95

end
Source
Pure-state transformations and catalysis under operations that completely preserve positivity of partial transpose, arXiv:0801.4322v2, PDF p. 8, Theorem 18: exact rank-three preparation from an EPR pair
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every probability vector λ=(λ0,λ1,λ2)\lambda=(\lambda_0,\lambda_1,\lambda_2)λ=(λ0​,λ1​,λ2​) satisfying 0<λ0≤λ1≤λ20<\lambda_0\le\lambda_1\le\lambda_20<λ0​≤λ1​≤λ2​ and λ0+λ1+λ2=1\lambda_0+\lambda_1+\lambda_2=1λ0​+λ1​+λ2​=1, let Ω2=12∑i,j=01∣ii⟩⟨jj∣\Omega_2=\frac12\sum_{i,j=0}^1|ii\rangle\langle jj|Ω2​=21​∑i,j=01​∣ii⟩⟨jj∣, and let ρλ\rho_\lambdaρλ​ on C3⊗C3\mathbb C^3\otimes\mathbb C^3C3⊗C3 have entry λiλk\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_k}λi​λk​​ at ((i,i),(k,k))((i,i),(k,k))((i,i),(k,k)) and zero entries elsewhere. There exists a complex-linear, trace-preserving, completely positive map L\mathcal LL with L(Ω2)=ρλ\mathcal L(\Omega_2)=\rho_\lambdaL(Ω2​)=ρλ​ and with ΓoutLΓin\Gamma_{\rm out}\mathcal L\Gamma_{\rm in}Γout​LΓin​ completely positive if and only if

2(λ2λ1+λ2λ0)+4λ0λ1≤1.2\bigl(\sqrt{\lambda_2\lambda_1}+\sqrt{\lambda_2\lambda_0}\bigr) +4\sqrt{\lambda_0\lambda_1}\le1.2(λ2​λ1​​+λ2​λ0​​)+4λ0​λ1​​≤1.

Here Γ\GammaΓ is partial transpose on the second tensor factor, (ΓX)(i,j),(k,l)=X(i,l),(k,j)(\Gamma X)_{(i,j),(k,l)}=X_{(i,l),(k,j)}(ΓX)(i,j),(k,l)​=X(i,l),(k,j)​; trace preservation applies to every matrix, and complete positivity requires positivity preservation after every finite identity amplification, including size zero.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me