Atlas III goal: local equivalence of the Kerr–Newman perturbation systems (1) and (7), both spins
ProvedHintz2026.mainFix subextremal Kerr–Newman parameters , , , a frequency and an azimuthal number (kept real), and let . The statement is the conjunction of the two spin cases.
Positive spin. For every quadruple of fields on and every : the four first-order equations (1a)–(1d) of Hintz hold at if and only if the transformed system (7),
holds at for , , where are the chiral variables of eq. (3), is the matrix integrating factor of eq. (5), and with the coefficients of eq. (4).
Negative spin. The same equivalence for fields , the negative-spin system obtained from (1a)–(1d) by the paper's replacement rules, the chiral variables and the coefficients with .
The transformation is explicit and invertible on (inverse maps invPos, invNeg, yplus_of_zplus, yminus_of_zminus), so this is a two-sided local correspondence of solutions, proved for arbitrary fields rather than for known solutions. It is the algebraic core of Hintz's separation of variables; nothing is asserted about the angular eigenvalue problem, the radial reduction, boundary behaviour or mode stability.
import Definitions.Def_Hintz2026_Chiral open Hintz2026 Complex Function Matrix open scoped ComplexConjugate ContDiff
theorem Hintz2026.main (p : SubextremalKN) (om mm : ℝ) : (∀ F : PosFields, PosSmooth p F → ∀ x ∈ U p, (Sys1PosAt p om mm F x ↔ Sys7At p 1 om mm (yPos p 1 F) (yPos p (-1) F) x)) ∧ (∀ G : NegFields, NegSmooth p G → ∀ x ∈ U p, (Sys1NegAt p om mm G x ↔ Sys7At p (-1) om mm (yNeg p 1 G) (yNeg p (-1) G) x)) := by sorry
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.