Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 5.2 (Algorithm MR) — global convergence of Algorithm MR

Proved
GlobalInexactNewton.Backtracking.theorem_5_2_mr

by mikedeng1 · Oct 6, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

global-convergenceinexact-newtonp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Let EEE be a finite-dimensional real normed space and F:E→EF:E\to EF:E→E continuously differentiable. Assume that Algorithm MR does not break down, producing iterates xkx_kxk​, initial levels ηˉk\bar\eta_kηˉ​k​, curves σk\sigma_kσk​ and final levels ηk\eta_kηk​. Let x∗x_*x∗​ be a limit point of (xk)(x_k)(xk​) for which there is a constant Γ\GammaΓ, independent of kkk, such that

∥σk(η)∥≤Γ(1−η)∥F(xk)∥,ηˉk≤η≤1,(5.6)\|\sigma_k(\eta)\|\le\Gamma(1-\eta)\|F(x_k)\|,\qquad\bar\eta_k\le\eta\le1, \tag{5.6}∥σk​(η)∥≤Γ(1−η)∥F(xk​)∥,ηˉ​k​≤η≤1,(5.6)

holds whenever xkx_kxk​ is sufficiently near x∗x_*x∗​. Then F(x∗)=0F(x_*)=0F(x∗​)=0 and xk→x∗x_k\to x_*xk​→x∗​. Furthermore, ηk=ηˉk\eta_k=\bar\eta_kηk​=ηˉ​k​ for all sufficiently large kkk: eventually the initial level is accepted without backtracking.

No invertibility of F′(x∗)F'(x_*)F′(x∗​) is assumed. Combined with an estimate of the form (5.6) near a point where F′F'F′ is invertible, the theorem yields the convergence of the backtracking methods of §6.

Formalization Note The paper says "sufficiently near"; we state: there exist Γ∈R\Gamma\in\mathbb RΓ∈R and δ>0\delta>0δ>0 such that (5.6) holds for every kkk with ∥xk−x∗∥<δ\|x_k-x_*\|<\delta∥xk​−x∗​∥<δ. Unlike (3.2), the paper does not add "for kkk sufficiently large" here, and neither does the statement. "For all sufficiently large kkk" in the conclusion is the atTop filter.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_GlobalInexactNewton_Backtracking_Method
open Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace GlobalInexactNewton.Backtracking

/-- Eisenstat–Walker (1994), p. 408, Theorem 5.2 for Algorithm MR: assume Algorithm MR does not break
down. If `x_*` is a limit point of `{x_k}` such that there is a `Γ` independent of `k` for which
(5.6) `‖σ_k(η)‖ ≤ Γ (1 - η) ‖F(x_k)‖`, `η̄_k ≤ η ≤ 1`, holds whenever `x_k` is sufficiently near
`x_*`, then `F(x_*) = 0` and `x_k → x_*`; furthermore `η_k = η̄_k` for all sufficiently large `k`.
"Sufficiently near" is `∃ δ > 0`, after `∃ Γ`; no invertibility of `F'(x_*)` is assumed. -/
theorem theorem_5_2_mr {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
    (F : E → E) (hF : ContDiff ℝ 1 F) (ηmax t θmin θmax : ℝ) (x : ℕ → E) (ηbar : ℕ → ℝ)
    (σ : ℕ → ℝ → E) (θ : ℕ → ℕ → ℝ) (m : ℕ → ℕ)
    (hrun : IsMRRun F ηmax t θmin θmax x ηbar σ θ m)
    (xstar : E) (hlim : MapClusterPt xstar atTop x)
    (hΓ : ∃ Γ : ℝ, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ k, x k ∈ Metric.ball xstar δ →
      ∀ η ∈ Set.Icc (ηbar k) 1, ‖σ k η‖ ≤ Γ * (1 - η) * ‖F (x k)‖) :
    F xstar = 0 ∧ Tendsto x atTop (𝓝 xstar) ∧
      ∀ᶠ k in atTop, trialLevel (ηbar k) (θ k) (m k) = ηbar k := by sorry

end GlobalInexactNewton.Backtracking
Source
Eisenstat and Walker, Globally Convergent Inexact Newton Methods, SIAM J. Optim. 4(2) (1994), p. 408, Theorem 5.2 (Algorithm MR)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 6, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 6, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me