Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Cloc∞C^\infty_{loc}Cloc∞​ limits of embedded fast planes are embedded

Open
FiniteEnergyPlane.isEmbeddedPlane_of_tendstoCInftyLocOn

by Mazecto · Nov 3, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fast-planesfredholm-theorypseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ. Let uku_kuk​ be embedded fast finite-energy planes which converge in Cloc∞(C)C^\infty_{loc}(\mathbb{C})Cloc∞​(C) to a fast finite-energy plane vvv. Then vvv is embedded.

Formalization Note "Fast" is IsFastPlane, "embedded" is IsEmbeddedPlane, and Cloc∞C^\infty_{loc}Cloc∞​ convergence is JHolomorphic.TendstoCInftyLocOn on Set.univ. No hypothesis on the asymptotic orbits of uku_kuk​ and vvv is made; they need not coincide.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), § 4.7 (closedness of `Λ`). Let `uₖ` be embedded fast
finite-energy planes converging in `C^∞_loc(ℂ)` to a fast finite-energy plane `v`. Then `v` is
embedded. -/
theorem isEmbeddedPlane_of_tendstoCInftyLocOn (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
    (u : ℕ → ℂ → V 1) (v : ℂ → V 1) (hu : ∀ k, IsFastPlane H J (u k))
    (hue : ∀ k, IsEmbeddedPlane (u k)) (hv : IsFastPlane H J v)
    (hconv : JHolomorphic.TendstoCInftyLocOn u v Set.univ) :
    IsEmbeddedPlane v := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Section 4.7 (closedness of Λ(H,P)\Lambda(H,P)Λ(H,P) in Θ(H,P)\Theta(H,P)Θ(H,P))
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Read-back: FiniteEnergyPlane.isEmbeddedPlane_of_tendstoCInftyLocOn

Statement. Let H:R4→RH : \mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}H:R4→R be a function whose level set S={H=1}S = \{H = 1\}S={H=1} is strictly star-shaped (in the sense (1) below), let JJJ be a compatible complex structure on the contact planes (in the sense (2) below), let (uk)k∈N(u_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}}(uk​)k∈N​ be a sequence of maps uk:C→R4u_k : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4uk​:C→R4 and v:C→R4v : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4v:C→R4 a map. Assume:

  • every uku_kuk​ is a fast plane for (H,J)(H, J)(H,J) (definition (6) below);
  • every uku_kuk​ is an embedded plane (definition (7) below);
  • vvv is a fast plane for (H,J)(H, J)(H,J);
  • uk→vu_k \to vuk​→v in Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ on all of C\mathbb{C}C (definition (8) below).

Then vvv is an embedded plane. No other hypotheses appear; in particular nothing is assumed about the asymptotic orbits of the uku_kuk​ or vvv being the same, about energies, or about the Reeb orbits beyond what is contained in "fast plane".

Notation used throughout. R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 is the space of real 4-tuples x=(x0,x1,x2,x3)x = (x_0, x_1, x_2, x_3)x=(x0​,x1​,x2​,x3​), normed by the sup norm ∥x∥=max⁡i∣xi∣\|x\| = \max_i |x_i|∥x∥=maxi​∣xi​∣. Put

j0(v)=(−v1, v0, −v3, v2),ω0(u,v)=⟨j0u,v⟩=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2,λx(v)=12 ω0(x,v).j_0(v) = (-v_1,\, v_0,\, -v_3,\, v_2), \qquad \omega_0(u, v) = \langle j_0 u, v\rangle = u_0 v_1 - u_1 v_0 + u_2 v_3 - u_3 v_2, \qquad \lambda_x(v) = \tfrac12\, \omega_0(x, v).j0​(v)=(−v1​,v0​,−v3​,v2​),ω0​(u,v)=⟨j0​u,v⟩=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​,λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v).

∇H(x)\nabla H(x)∇H(x) is the vector of partial derivatives (dHx(ei))i\big(dH_x(e_i)\big)_i(dHx​(ei​))i​, XH(x)=j0∇H(x)X_H(x) = j_0 \nabla H(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x), and the Reeb field is

R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1 XH(x),R(x) = \lambda_x\big(X_H(x)\big)^{-1}\, X_H(x),R(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x),

with the convention 0−1=00^{-1} = 00−1=0. Let ξx={w:λx(w)=0 and dHx(w)=0}\xi_x = \{ w : \lambda_x(w) = 0 \text{ and } dH_x(w) = 0\}ξx​={w:λx​(w)=0 and dHx​(w)=0}. For fff defined on C={s+it}\mathbb{C} = \{s + it\}C={s+it} write ∂sf(z)=Df(z)⋅1\partial_s f(z) = Df(z)\cdot 1∂s​f(z)=Df(z)⋅1 and ∂tf(z)=Df(z)⋅i\partial_t f(z) = Df(z)\cdot i∂t​f(z)=Df(z)⋅i, where Df(z)Df(z)Df(z) is the real Fréchet derivative (equal to 000 by convention where fff is not differentiable).

(1) Strictly star-shaped level. HHH is C∞C^\inftyC∞; for every u≠0u \ne 0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r > 0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru) = 1H(ru)=1; and dHx(x)>0dH_x(x) > 0dHx​(x)>0 for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x) = 1H(x)=1.

(2) Compatible structure. JJJ is a C∞C^\inftyC∞ map from R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 to real linear maps R4→R4\mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}^4R4→R4 such that, for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x) = 1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv, w \in \xi_xv,w∈ξx​: J(x)v∈ξxJ(x)v \in \xi_xJ(x)v∈ξx​; J(x)J(x)v=−vJ(x)J(x)v = -vJ(x)J(x)v=−v; ω0(v,J(x)v)>0\omega_0(v, J(x)v) > 0ω0​(v,J(x)v)>0 if v≠0v \ne 0v=0; and ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J(x)v, J(x)w) = \omega_0(v, w)ω0​(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0​(v,w). Nothing is required of J(x)J(x)J(x) off SSS or outside ξx\xi_xξx​.

(3) Radial coordinates. For y∈R4y \in \mathbb{R}^4y∈R4 let ρ(y)\rho(y)ρ(y) be some chosen r>0r > 0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry) = 1H(ry)=1 if such an rrr exists, and ρ(y)=1\rho(y) = 1ρ(y)=1 otherwise (for y≠0y \ne 0y=0 it is the unique one by (1); for y=0y = 0y=0 it is an arbitrary positive number if H(0)=1H(0) = 1H(0)=1, and 111 otherwise). Put

π(y)=ρ(y) y,a(y)=−12log⁡ρ(y).\pi(y) = \rho(y)\, y, \qquad a(y) = -\tfrac12 \log \rho(y).π(y)=ρ(y)y,a(y)=−21​logρ(y).

The almost complex structure J~(y)\tilde J(y)J~(y) on R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 is: with x=π(y)x = \pi(y)x=π(y), r=ρ(y)r = \rho(y)r=ρ(y), α(w)=r2 dHx(x) dHx(w)\alpha(w) = \frac{r}{2\, dH_x(x)}\, dH_x(w)α(w)=2dHx​(x)r​dHx​(w), β(w)=r λx(w)\beta(w) = r\,\lambda_x(w)β(w)=rλx​(w),

J~(y)w=α(w) r−1R(x)−2β(w) y+J(x)(w−2α(w) y−β(w) r−1R(x)).\tilde J(y) w = \alpha(w)\, r^{-1} R(x) - 2\beta(w)\, y + J(x)\Big( w - 2\alpha(w)\, y - \beta(w)\, r^{-1} R(x) \Big).J~(y)w=α(w)r−1R(x)−2β(w)y+J(x)(w−2α(w)y−β(w)r−1R(x)).

(4) Reeb orbits. A Reeb orbit PPP consists of a map xP:R→R4x_P : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^4xP​:R→R4 and a number TP>0T_P > 0TP​>0 with H(xP(τ))=1H(x_P(\tau)) = 1H(xP​(τ))=1, xP′(τ)=R(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau) = R(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=R(xP​(τ)) and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau + T_P) = x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ (TPT_PTP​ is a period, not necessarily the minimal one). PPP is prime if xP(τ)≠xP(0)x_P(\tau) \ne x_P(0)xP​(τ)=xP​(0) for all 0<τ<TP0 < \tau < T_P0<τ<TP​.

(5) Nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞. For u:C→R4u : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 and a Reeb orbit PPP, write e(s,t)=e2πse2πite(s, t) = e^{2\pi s} e^{2\pi i t}e(s,t)=e2πse2πit. "uuu has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to PPP" means: there are real d,cd, cd,c and b>0b > 0b>0 with

sup⁡t∈R∣a(u(e(s,t)))−TP s−d∣→0,sup⁡t∈Rebs ∥π(u(e(s,t)))−xP(TPt+c)∥→0(s→+∞).\sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}} \big| a(u(e(s,t))) - T_P\, s - d \big| \to 0, \qquad \sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}} e^{bs}\, \big\| \pi(u(e(s,t))) - x_P(T_P t + c) \big\| \to 0 \qquad (s \to +\infty).t∈Rsup​​a(u(e(s,t)))−TP​s−d​→0,t∈Rsup​ebs​π(u(e(s,t)))−xP​(TP​t+c)​→0(s→+∞).

(6) Fast plane. u:C→R4u : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 is a fast plane for (H,J)(H, J)(H,J) if all of the following hold:

  • uuu is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on C\mathbb{C}C, u(z)≠0u(z) \ne 0u(z)=0 for all zzz, and uuu is J~\tilde JJ~-holomorphic on C\mathbb{C}C: at every zzz, uuu is real-differentiable and ∂su(z)+J~(u(z)) ∂tu(z)=0\partial_s u(z) + \tilde J(u(z))\, \partial_t u(z) = 0∂s​u(z)+J~(u(z))∂t​u(z)=0;
  • the energy is finite: with A\mathcal{A}A the set of C∞C^\inftyC∞, nondecreasing φ:R→[0,1]\varphi : \mathbb{R} \to [0, 1]φ:R→[0,1], and with a=a∘u\mathbf a = a \circ ua=a∘u, w=π∘uw = \pi \circ uw=π∘u,
E(u)=sup⁡φ∈A∫Cmax⁡(0,  φ′(a)(∂sa λw(∂tw)−∂ta λw(∂sw))+φ(a) ω0(∂sw,∂tw)) dz<∞E(u) = \sup_{\varphi \in \mathcal{A}} \int_{\mathbb{C}} \max\Big(0,\; \varphi'(\mathbf a)\big(\partial_s \mathbf a\, \lambda_w(\partial_t w) - \partial_t \mathbf a\, \lambda_w(\partial_s w)\big) + \varphi(\mathbf a)\, \omega_0(\partial_s w, \partial_t w)\Big)\, dz < \inftyE(u)=φ∈Asup​∫C​max(0,φ′(a)(∂s​aλw​(∂t​w)−∂t​aλw​(∂s​w))+φ(a)ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w))dz<∞

(Lebesgue measure, value in [0,∞][0, \infty][0,∞]);

  • there exists a prime Reeb orbit PPP such that uuu has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to PPP (5);
  • the "winding of πξ∂sw\pi_\xi \partial_s wπξ​∂s​w" condition: let Π(z)=ζw(z)(∂sw(z)−λw(z)(∂sw(z)) R(w(z)))∈C\Pi(z) = \zeta_{w(z)}\big(\partial_s w(z) - \lambda_{w(z)}(\partial_s w(z))\, R(w(z))\big) \in \mathbb{C}Π(z)=ζw(z)​(∂s​w(z)−λw(z)​(∂s​w(z))R(w(z)))∈C, where ζx(v)=ω0(v,F2(x))+i ω0(F1(x),v)\zeta_x(v) = \omega_0(v, F_2(x)) + i\, \omega_0(F_1(x), v)ζx​(v)=ω0​(v,F2​(x))+iω0​(F1​(x),v) with
F1(x)=∣x∣−1(Q2x−dHx(Q2x)dHx(x) x),F2(x)=∣x∣−1(Q1x−dHx(Q1x)dHx(x) x),F_1(x) = |x|^{-1}\Big(Q_2 x - \tfrac{dH_x(Q_2 x)}{dH_x(x)}\, x\Big), \quad F_2(x) = |x|^{-1}\Big(Q_1 x - \tfrac{dH_x(Q_1 x)}{dH_x(x)}\, x\Big),F1​(x)=∣x∣−1(Q2​x−dHx​(x)dHx​(Q2​x)​x),F2​(x)=∣x∣−1(Q1​x−dHx​(x)dHx​(Q1​x)​x),

Q1x=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_1 x = (-x_2, x_3, x_0, -x_1)Q1​x=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), Q2x=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_2 x = (x_3, x_2, -x_1, -x_0)Q2​x=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​), ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm. Then: the zero set ZZZ of Π\PiΠ in C\mathbb{C}C is finite, and there are integers kzk_zkz​ (z∈Zz \in Zz∈Z) with ∑z∈Zkz=0\sum_{z \in Z} k_z = 0∑z∈Z​kz​=0 such that each zero zzz is isolated with index kzk_zkz​, meaning: there is r>0r > 0r>0 with Π≠0\Pi \ne 0Π=0 on B‾(z,r)∖{z}\overline{B}(z, r) \setminus \{z\}B(z,r)∖{z}, and for every ρ∈(0,r)\rho \in (0, r)ρ∈(0,r) the loop t↦Π(z+ρe2πit)t \mapsto \Pi(z + \rho e^{2\pi i t})t↦Π(z+ρe2πit) is continuous, 1-periodic, nowhere zero, and has a continuous argument θ\thetaθ (Π=∣Π∣eiθ\Pi = |\Pi| e^{i\theta}Π=∣Π∣eiθ) with θ(1)−θ(0)=2πkz\theta(1) - \theta(0) = 2\pi k_zθ(1)−θ(0)=2πkz​. (If Π\PiΠ has no zeros this holds with Z=∅Z = \emptysetZ=∅; the condition only requires the indices to sum to 000.)

(7) Embedded plane. u:C→R4u : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 is an embedded plane if uuu is injective and for every z∈Cz \in \mathbb{C}z∈C the real derivative Du(z):C≅R2→R4Du(z) : \mathbb{C} \cong \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^4Du(z):C≅R2→R4 is injective. (Since the derivative is taken to be 000 where uuu is not differentiable, this includes differentiability at every point.)

(8) Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ convergence on C\mathbb{C}C. For every compact K⊆CK \subseteq \mathbb{C}K⊆C and every m∈Nm \in \mathbb{N}m∈N, the mmm-th iterated real Fréchet derivatives DmukD^m u_kDmuk​ converge to DmvD^m vDmv uniformly on KKK as k→∞k \to \inftyk→∞ (for m=0m = 0m=0: uk→vu_k \to vuk​→v uniformly on KKK).

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me