Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Weak coupling: kBTc≈1.14 ℏωD e−1/V0Z(EF)k_BT_c \approx 1.14\,\hbar\omega_D\,e^{-1/V_0Z(E_F)}kB​Tc​≈1.14ℏωD​e−1/V0​Z(EF​)

Proved
BCSTheory.criticalTemperature_weak_coupling

by Lucas · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

bcs-theorysuperconductivity

For fixed kB>0k_B>0kB​>0 and ℏωD>0\hbar\omega_D>0ℏωD​>0, as λ=V0Z(EF)→0+\lambda=V_0Z(E_F)\to0^+λ=V0​Z(EF​)→0+,

kBTcℏωD e−1/λ→2eγπ=1.1338…,\frac{k_BT_c}{\hbar\omega_D\,e^{-1/\lambda}} \to \frac{2e^{\gamma}}{\pi} = 1.1338\ldots,ℏωD​e−1/λkB​Tc​​→π2eγ​=1.1338…,

where γ\gammaγ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_BCSTheory_GapEquation
open Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace BCSTheory

theorem criticalTemperature_weak_coupling (kB hbarOmegaD : ℝ) (hkB : 0 < kB)
    (hω : 0 < hbarOmegaD) :
    Tendsto (fun coupling : ℝ =>
        kB * criticalTemperature kB hbarOmegaD coupling /
          (hbarOmegaD * Real.exp (-1 / coupling)))
      (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (2 * Real.exp Real.eulerMascheroniConstant / Real.pi)) := by sorry

end BCSTheory
Source
Wikipedia (de), Artikel „BCS-Theorie“ (PDF-Ausdruck vom 05.10.2026), Abschnitt „Erfolge der BCS-Theorie“, Unterabschnitt „Existenz einer Energielücke“, Formel kBTc=1,14 ℏωDe−1/V0Z(EF)k_BT_c = 1{,}14\,\hbar\omega_D e^{-1/V_0Z(E_F)}kB​Tc​=1,14ℏωD​e−1/V0​Z(EF​) (exakte Konstante 2eγ/π2e^\gamma/\pi2eγ/π folgt aus Δ(0)=2ℏωDe−1/V0Z(EF)=(π/eγ)kBTc\Delta(0) = 2\hbar\omega_D e^{-1/V_0Z(E_F)} = (\pi/e^\gamma) k_BT_cΔ(0)=2ℏωD​e−1/V0​Z(EF​)=(π/eγ)kB​Tc​).
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) — same agent as the drafter; non-blind

Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent (Aristotle, by Harmonic) that drafted the Lean statements, with full knowledge of the source text and of the intended meaning. It was not produced by a blind, independent auditor and must not be mistaken for independent testimony; an independent read-back is still advisable before launch.

Let kB,ℏωDk_B, \hbar\omega_DkB​,ℏωD​ be real numbers with kB>0k_B>0kB​>0 and ℏωD>0\hbar\omega_D>0ℏωD​>0. Then, as λ→0+\lambda\to0^+λ→0+ (through strictly positive values),

kB Tc(kB,ℏωD,λ)ℏωD e−1/λ⟶2eγπ,\frac{k_B\,T_c(k_B,\hbar\omega_D,\lambda)}{\hbar\omega_D\,e^{-1/\lambda}} \longrightarrow \frac{2e^{\gamma}}{\pi},ℏωD​e−1/λkB​Tc​(kB​,ℏωD​,λ)​⟶π2eγ​,

where γ\gammaγ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant and Tc(kB,ℏωD,λ)T_c(k_B,\hbar\omega_D,\lambda)Tc​(kB​,ℏωD​,λ) is the critical temperature of the definition file: the supremum of all T>0T>0T>0 with ∫0ℏωDtanh⁡(∣η∣/(2kBT))/∣η∣ dη=1/λ\int_0^{\hbar\omega_D}\tanh(|\eta|/(2k_BT))/|\eta|\,d\eta = 1/\lambda∫0ℏωD​​tanh(∣η∣/(2kB​T))/∣η∣dη=1/λ (supremum =0=0=0 if this set is empty or unbounded). Numerically 2eγ/π≈1.13392e^\gamma/\pi\approx1.13392eγ/π≈1.1339; the statement uses the exact constant, not 1.141.141.14.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me