Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Positive-reserve unit derivative of the zero-extended affine verification candidate

Proved
AvramDividend.Classical.affine_cutoff_deriv_eq_one_positive

by WillR · Oct 26, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

counterexample-auditgradientoptimal-dividendsstochastic-verificationunbounded-variation

The candidate verification function equal to zero below reserve zero and z−1 for nonnegative reserves has derivative one at every strictly positive reserve. The proof uses its agreement with the affine function on a neighbourhood of any positive point. This discharges the gradient inequality in the Gaussian counterexample audit of the unbounded-variation stochastic verification theorem.

Preamble
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic

open Filter Set
open scoped Topology
Formal statement
theorem AvramDividend.Classical.affine_cutoff_deriv_eq_one_positive
    (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
    deriv (fun z : ℝ => if z < 0 then 0 else z - 1) y = 1 := by sorry
Source
Avram, Palmowski and Pistorius (2007), Proposition 4(i), derivative HJB condition.

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me