Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

(RC[ϵ,δ,Ω\epsilon,\delta,\Omegaϵ,δ,Ω]) is less conservative than (IRC[ϵ,δ\epsilon,\deltaϵ,δ])

Proved
RobustLP.Counterpart.irc_feasible_rc_feasible

by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

linear-programmingp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1robust-optimization

Let an uncertain linear program with uncertain-entry sets JiJ_iJi​ be given, and let ϵ>0\epsilon>0ϵ>0, δ>0\delta>0δ>0, Ω>0\Omega>0Ω>0. If (x,y)(x,y)(x,y) is feasible for the interval robust counterpart (IRC[ε, δ]), then (x,y′,z′)(x, y', z')(x,y′,z′) with

yij′=yj,zij′=0for all i,jy'_{ij} = y_j,\qquad z'_{ij} = 0\qquad\text{for all } i, jyij′​=yj​,zij′​=0for all i,j

is feasible for the robust counterpart (RC[ε, δ, Ω]).

Every xxx admissible for the linear counterpart is therefore admissible for the conic one, so the optimal value of (RC) is at most that of (IRC).

Formalization Note The page does not state the sign of Ω\OmegaΩ; the hypothesis Ω>0\Omega>0Ω>0 is carried for uniformity with Proposition 1, where (RC) is introduced with a positive parameter.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_RobustLP_Counterpart_UncertainLP
import Definitions.Def_RobustLP_Counterpart_RobustCounterparts
Formal statement
namespace RobustLP.Counterpart

/-- **(RC) is less conservative than (IRC)** (Ben-Tal–Nemirovski 2000, §3.1, p. 420). For
`ε > 0`, `δ > 0`, `Ω > 0`: if `(x, y)` is feasible for (IRC[ε, δ]), then `(x, y', z')` with
`y'_{ij} = y_j` and `z'_{ij} = 0` is feasible for (RC[ε, δ, Ω]). -/
theorem irc_feasible_rc_feasible {n p m : ℕ} (L : UncertainLP n p m)
    (ε δ Ω : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hΩ : 0 < Ω) (x y : Fin n → ℝ)
    (hIRC : L.IRCFeasible ε δ x y) :
    L.RCFeasible ε δ Ω x (fun _ j => y j) (fun _ _ => 0) := by sorry

end RobustLP.Counterpart
Source
Ben-Tal and Nemirovski, Robust solutions of Linear Programming problems contaminated with uncertain data, Math. Program. Ser. A 88 (2000) 411–424, p. 420, §3.1, 'Note that (RC[ϵ, δ, Ω]) is "less conservative" that (IRC[ϵ, δ])'
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me