Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

(2.12)–(2.14) — 2∣⟨M,B−A⟩∣≤Λ∥PA(B−A)∥2+Γ∥PS1⊥BPS2⊥∥12|\langle M,B-A\rangle|\le\Lambda\|\mathcal P_A(B-A)\|_2+\Gamma\|P_{S_1^\perp}BP_{S_2^\perp}\|_12∣⟨M,B−A⟩∣≤Λ∥PA​(B−A)∥2​+Γ∥PS1⊥​​BPS2⊥​​∥1​ and Γ≤2∥M∥∞\Gamma\le2\|M\|_\inftyΓ≤2∥M∥∞​

Proved
KLTNuclear.Oracle.eq_2_12

by mikedeng1 · Oct 7, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

nuclear-normp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1trace-duality

Let A=∑j=1rσjujvj⊤A=\sum_{j=1}^r\sigma_ju_jv_j^\topA=∑j=1r​σj​uj​vj⊤​ be a singular value decomposition of a real m1×m2m_1\times m_2m1​×m2​ matrix with support (S1,S2)(S_1,S_2)(S1​,S2​), let PA(N)=N−PS1⊥NPS2⊥\mathcal P_A(N)=N-P_{S_1^\perp}NP_{S_2^\perp}PA​(N)=N−PS1⊥​​NPS2⊥​​, and let MMM and BBB be any m1×m2m_1\times m_2m1​×m2​ matrices. Set

Λ=2∥PA(M)∥2,Γ=2∥PS1⊥MPS2⊥∥∞,\Lambda=2\|\mathcal P_A(M)\|_2,\qquad\Gamma=2\|P_{S_1^\perp}MP_{S_2^\perp}\|_\infty,Λ=2∥PA​(M)∥2​,Γ=2∥PS1⊥​​MPS2⊥​​∥∞​,

with ∥⋅∥2\|\cdot\|_2∥⋅∥2​ the Frobenius norm and ∥⋅∥∞\|\cdot\|_\infty∥⋅∥∞​ the operator norm. Then

2∣⟨M,B−A⟩∣≤Λ∥PA(B−A)∥2+Γ∥PS1⊥BPS2⊥∥1≤Λ∥B−A∥2+Γ∥PS1⊥BPS2⊥∥1,2|\langle M,B-A\rangle|\le\Lambda\|\mathcal P_A(B-A)\|_2+\Gamma\|P_{S_1^\perp}BP_{S_2^\perp}\|_1\le\Lambda\|B-A\|_2+\Gamma\|P_{S_1^\perp}BP_{S_2^\perp}\|_1,2∣⟨M,B−A⟩∣≤Λ∥PA​(B−A)∥2​+Γ∥PS1⊥​​BPS2⊥​​∥1​≤Λ∥B−A∥2​+Γ∥PS1⊥​​BPS2⊥​​∥1​,

and

Γ≤2∥M∥∞.\Gamma\le2\|M\|_\infty .Γ≤2∥M∥∞​.

In the proof of Theorem 1 this is applied with M=MM=\mathbf MM=M and B=A^λB=\hat A^\lambdaB=A^λ to control the stochastic term of (2.11).

Formalization Note The paper states (2.12)–(2.14) for the random matrix M\mathbf MM and B=A^λB=\hat A^\lambdaB=A^λ; they are deterministic facts about any matrices and are stated so. Λ\LambdaΛ and Γ\GammaΓ are written out inline.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_KLTNuclear_Oracle_Model

open MeasureTheory MatrixCompletion
Formal statement
namespace KLTNuclear.Oracle

/-- (2.12)–(2.14) (p. 9), for an arbitrary matrix N in place of 𝐌 and B in place of Â^λ:
with Λ = 2‖𝒫_A(N)‖₂ and Γ = 2‖P_{S₁⊥} N P_{S₂⊥}‖∞ (2.13),
2|⟨N, B − A⟩| ≤ Λ‖𝒫_A(B − A)‖₂ + Γ‖P_{S₁⊥} B P_{S₂⊥}‖₁ ≤ Λ‖B − A‖₂ + Γ‖P_{S₁⊥} B P_{S₂⊥}‖₁,
and Γ ≤ 2‖N‖∞ (2.14). -/
theorem eq_2_12 {m₁ m₂ r : ℕ} {A : RealMatrix m₁ m₂} (S : SVD A r) (N B : RealMatrix m₁ m₂) :
    2 * |matrixInner N (B - A)| ≤
        2 * frobeniusNorm (tangentProjection S N) * frobeniusNorm (tangentProjection S (B - A)) +
          2 * spectralNorm (normalProjection S N) * nuclearNorm (normalProjection S B) ∧
      2 * frobeniusNorm (tangentProjection S N) * frobeniusNorm (tangentProjection S (B - A)) +
          2 * spectralNorm (normalProjection S N) * nuclearNorm (normalProjection S B) ≤
        2 * frobeniusNorm (tangentProjection S N) * frobeniusNorm (B - A) +
          2 * spectralNorm (normalProjection S N) * nuclearNorm (normalProjection S B) ∧
      2 * spectralNorm (normalProjection S N) ≤ 2 * spectralNorm N := by sorry

end KLTNuclear.Oracle
Source
Koltchinskii, Lounici, Tsybakov, Nuclear-Norm Penalization and Optimal Rates for Noisy Low-Rank Matrix Completion, arXiv:1011.6256v4, p. 9, (2.12), (2.13), (2.14)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 7, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 7, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me