Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 6.1 (ii), p. 216 — a proper supervisor with L_c(𝒮/𝒢) = K exists iff K is controllable and L_m(𝒢)-closed

Proved
RamadgeWonham.Synthesis.thm_6_1_ii

by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

discrete-event-systemsp2o-batch-p200ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1supervisory-control

Let G\mathcal GG be a generator over a finite alphabet with controllable events Σc\Sigma_cΣc​ and L(G)=Lˉm(G)L(\mathcal G) = \bar L_m(\mathcal G)L(G)=Lˉm​(G). Let K⊆Lm(G)K \subseteq L_m(\mathcal G)K⊆Lm​(G) with K≠∅K \neq \emptysetK=∅. There exists a proper supervisor S\mathcal SS (with accessible automaton) with

Lc(S/G)=KL_c(\mathcal S/\mathcal G) = KLc​(S/G)=K

if and only if KKK is controllable and Lm(G)L_m(\mathcal G)Lm​(G)-closed, that is, K=Kˉ∩Lm(G)K = \bar K \cap L_m(\mathcal G)K=Kˉ∩Lm​(G).

This is the counterpart of Theorem 6.1 (i) for the controlled language Lc(S/G)=L(S/G)∩Lm(G)L_c(\mathcal S/\mathcal G) = L(\mathcal S/\mathcal G) \cap L_m(\mathcal G)Lc​(S/G)=L(S/G)∩Lm​(G).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_RamadgeWonham_Shared_Supervisor
import Definitions.Def_RamadgeWonham_Synthesis_Controllable
Formal statement
namespace RamadgeWonham.Synthesis

/-- Ramadge–Wonham 1987, Theorem 6.1 (ii), p. 216. Standing assumptions: `Σ` finite (p. 207),
`L(𝒢) = L̄_m(𝒢)` (§5, p. 213), supervisors accessible (p. 210). Let `K ⊆ L_m(𝒢)`, `K ≠ ∅`.
There is a proper supervisor `𝒮` with `L_c(𝒮/𝒢) = K` iff `K` is controllable and
`L_m(𝒢)`-closed (`K = K̄ ∩ L_m(𝒢)`). -/
theorem thm_6_1_ii {α : Type} [Fintype α] (G : Shared.Generator α) (Ec : Set α)
    (hG : G.L = Shared.pre G.Lm) (K : Set (List α)) (hK : K ⊆ G.Lm) (hKne : K.Nonempty) :
    (∃ 𝒮 : Shared.Supervisor α Ec, 𝒮.S.Accessible ∧ Shared.Proper G 𝒮 ∧ Shared.Lcsup G 𝒮 = K) ↔
      (Controllable G Ec K ∧ LClosed G.Lm K) := by sorry

end RamadgeWonham.Synthesis
Source
Ramadge and Wonham, Supervisory Control of a Class of Discrete Event Processes, SIAM J. Control Optim. 25(1), 1987, p. 216, Theorem 6.1 (ii)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me