Implications among shrinkability notions
OpenQAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P32.shrinkability_implicationsLet be a continuous map between compactly generated Hausdorff spaces. A shrinkable map has a continuous section and a homotopy from to that stays over . Then
f\text{ shrinkable}\ \Longrightarrow\ f\text{ is a homotopy equivalence},\\ f\text{ shrinkable}\ \Longrightarrow\ f\text{ locally shrinkable}\ \Longrightarrow\ f\text{ $\mathcal{CG}$-locally shrinkable}. \end{gathered}$$ Local shrinkability uses an open cover of $B$; $\mathcal{CG}$-local shrinkability uses a $\mathcal{CG}$-cover. All restrictions are formed in $\mathrm{CGH}$. The homotopy equivalence in the first assertion has $f$ itself as its forward map.import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P32
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P32
universe u
open Set Topology
/-- Remark and Definition 4.3, PDF p.28: shrinkable maps are homotopy equivalences,
and shrinkable implies locally shrinkable implies CG-locally shrinkable.
The homotopy equivalence has f itself as its forward map. -/
theorem shrinkability_implications (X B : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace B] [T2Space X] [T2Space B]
[CompactlyGeneratedSpace X] [CompactlyGeneratedSpace B] (f : C(X, B)) :
(ShrinkableMap f → ∃ e : ContinuousMap.HomotopyEquiv X B, ∀ x, e x = f x) ∧
(ShrinkableMap f → LocallyShrinkableMap f) ∧
(LocallyShrinkableMap f → CGLocallyShrinkableMap f) := by sorry
end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P32
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol
Let and be Hausdorff, compactly generated topological spaces in the same universe, and let be continuous. To state the three conclusions explicitly, for any map , write for the following condition in the specified topologies: is continuous, and there exist continuous maps and satisfying
for every , , and . Write for this same condition after replacing the topologies on both and by their compactly generated topologies. For a subset , let send to , initially using the subspace topologies. The theorem asserts the conjunction of three implications: (i) if holds, there exists a homotopy equivalence with for every , meaning that is continuous and has a continuous map with homotopic to and homotopic to ; (ii) if holds, there exist an index type in the same universe and open subsets covering such that holds for every ; and (iii) if such an indexed open cover with these section and homotopy conditions exists, then there exist an index type in the same universe and subsets of such that holds for every , and for every compact subset there is a finite subset with
The subsets in this last family need not be open. No spaces, indices, or family members are assumed nonempty; empty covers can cover an empty base, and the compact-set condition allows an empty finite selection when .
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.