OAI.Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates.exists_closed_cycle_intersection_radius: intermediate lemma from OpenAI, The crossing number of complete bipartite graphs
ProvedOAI.Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates.exists_closed_cycle_intersection_radiusAn intermediate lemma of the split of OpenAI's proof of OAI.Zarankiewicz.mainTarget_proof, carved from OpenAI's openai/math development for this platform. The statement and its proof are OpenAI's (OpenAI, The crossing number of complete bipartite graphs, OpenAI Math Release, September 23, 2026, result family 165, github.com/openai/math, Apache License 2.0); in Lean it is the declaration OAI.Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates.exists_closed_cycle_intersection_radius of lean/OAI/Combinatorics/Crossing/GlobalCycleIntersection.lean at commit adc7f12, ported to Lean 4.33.1 and Mathlib 0df444a.
The statement, as published (namespace OAI.Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates, with open scoped BigOperators):
theorem exists_closed_cycle_intersection_radius (hnorm : NoAdjacentCrossings D)
(hstraight : LocallyStraightCrossings D) (htrans : LocallyTransverseCrossings D) :
∃ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ ∧ ∀ ε : ℝ, ε ≠ 0 → |ε| < δ →
∀ (d f : ℕ → (completeBipartite m n).Dart)
(hd : ∀ i, (d i).snd=(d (i+1)).fst) (hf : ∀ j, (f j).snd=(f (j+1)).fst)
(N K : ℕ), d N=d 0 → f K=f 0 →
(∀ i, i < N → bipartiteDartEdge (d (i+1)) ≠ bipartiteDartEdge (d i)) →
(∀ j, j < K → bipartiteDartEdge (f (j+1)) ≠ bipartiteDartEdge (f j)) →
∑ i ∈ Finset.range N, ∑ j ∈ Finset.range K,
(bipartiteDartSign (d i)*bipartiteDartSign (f j)*
V.signedIntersection (bipartiteDartEdge (d i)) (bipartiteDartEdge (f j))+
C.passageIntersection d f hd hf i j ε)=0
Definitions. The statement is written with OAI.Zarankiewicz.NoAdjacentCrossings, OAI.Zarankiewicz.bipartiteDartEdge, OAI.Zarankiewicz.bipartiteDartSign and OAI.Zarankiewicz.completeBipartite (definitions bundle OAIB3Zr001 of this split); OAI.Zarankiewicz.LocallyStraightCrossings, OAI.Zarankiewicz.LocallyTransverseCrossings, OAI.Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates, OAI.Zarankiewicz.VertexTruncation, OAI.Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates.passageIntersection and OAI.Zarankiewicz.VertexTruncation.signedIntersection (definitions bundle OAIB3Zr002 of this split); OAI.Zarankiewicz.AdmissibleDrawing and OAI.Zarankiewicz.BipartiteEdge (the published bundle Def_BipartiteCrossing).
Used by. The proof of OAI.Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates.additive_detector_relation of this split imports it.
import Mathlib import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Omega import Definitions.Def_BipartiteCrossing import Definitions.Def_OAIB3Zr002
section
set_option linter.all false
set_option linter.unusedVariables false
set_option linter.unusedTactic false
set_option linter.unreachableTactic false
namespace OAI
noncomputable section
namespace Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates
open scoped BigOperators
variable {m n : ℕ} {D : AdmissibleDrawing m n} {V : VertexTruncation D.toContinuousDrawing}
(C : TruncatedSpokeCoordinates V)
theorem exists_closed_cycle_intersection_radius (hnorm : NoAdjacentCrossings D)
(hstraight : LocallyStraightCrossings D) (htrans : LocallyTransverseCrossings D) :
∃ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ ∧ ∀ ε : ℝ, ε ≠ 0 → |ε| < δ →
∀ (d f : ℕ → (completeBipartite m n).Dart)
(hd : ∀ i, (d i).snd=(d (i+1)).fst) (hf : ∀ j, (f j).snd=(f (j+1)).fst)
(N K : ℕ), d N=d 0 → f K=f 0 →
(∀ i, i < N → bipartiteDartEdge (d (i+1)) ≠ bipartiteDartEdge (d i)) →
(∀ j, j < K → bipartiteDartEdge (f (j+1)) ≠ bipartiteDartEdge (f j)) →
∑ i ∈ Finset.range N, ∑ j ∈ Finset.range K,
(bipartiteDartSign (d i)*bipartiteDartSign (f j)*
V.signedIntersection (bipartiteDartEdge (d i)) (bipartiteDartEdge (f j))+
C.passageIntersection d f hd hf i j ε)=0 := by
sorry
end Zarankiewicz.TruncatedSpokeCoordinates
end
end OAI
end