Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 21: maximally entangled PPT catalysts, seed headline

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95.theorem21

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let λ=(λ1,…,λd)\lambda=(\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_d)λ=(λ1​,…,λd​) be a finite probability vector: every entry is nonnegative and the entries sum to one. Write ρλ=∑i,jλiλj∣ii⟩⟨jj∣\rho_\lambda=\sum_{i,j}\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}|ii\rangle\langle jj|ρλ​=∑i,j​λi​λj​​∣ii⟩⟨jj∣. All logarithms have base two. A PPT operation is a completely positive, trace-preserving map LLL such that ΓoutLΓin\Gamma_{\rm out}L\Gamma_{\rm in}Γout​LΓin​ is completely positive for arbitrary finite ancillary systems; Γ\GammaΓ transposes Bob in the fixed product basis. For a positive integer KKK, ΦK\Phi_KΦK​ denotes the maximally entangled state of Schmidt rank KKK. For a finite order ttt, StS_tSt​ is the Rényi entropy, with S0S_0S0​ the log support size, S1=−∑iλilog⁡2λiS_1=-\sum_i\lambda_i\log_2\lambda_iS1​=−∑i​λi​log2​λi​ (using 0log⁡20=00\log_2 0=00log2​0=0), and St=(1−t)−1log⁡2∑iλitS_t=(1-t)^{-1}\log_2\sum_i\lambda_i^tSt​=(1−t)−1log2​∑i​λit​ otherwise. The separate infinity order is S∞=−log⁡2max⁡iλiS_\infty=-\log_2\max_i\lambda_iS∞​=−log2​maxi​λi​. Let K≥2K\ge2K≥2 and assume the nonzero spectrum of λ\lambdaλ is not the uniform spectrum of rank KKK. A maximally entangled catalyst of some finite rank C≥2C\ge2C≥2 exists exactly when

[∃C≥2:  ΦC⊗ΦK→PPTΦC⊗ρλ]⟺S1/2(λ)<log⁡2K.\bigl[\exists C\ge2:\;\Phi_C\otimes\Phi_K\to^{\rm PPT}\Phi_C\otimes\rho_\lambda\bigr]\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad S_{1/2}(\lambda)<\log_2 K.[∃C≥2:ΦC​⊗ΦK​→PPTΦC​⊗ρλ​]⟺S1/2​(λ)<log2​K.

The catalyst is returned exactly and uncorrelated with the target, with tensor factors grouped by Alice and Bob. Its rank and the channel may depend on KKK and λ\lambdaλ. This includes nontrivial targets of rank at most KKK.

Furthermore, whenever S1/2(λ)<log⁡2KS_{1/2}(\lambda)<\log_2 KS1/2​(λ)<log2​K, there is an integer C0≥2C_0\ge2C0​≥2, depending only on KKK and λ\lambdaλ, such that for every integer C≥C0C\ge C_0C≥C0​ a PPT channel sends ΦC⊗ΦK\Phi_C\otimes\Phi_KΦC​⊗ΦK​ exactly to ΦC⊗ρλ\Phi_C\otimes\rho_\lambdaΦC​⊗ρλ​.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P95
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexOrder

open Filter

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

-- Exact primitives from the pinned accepted library; no local aliases.

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Claimed50.P28 (maximallyEntangledDensity)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P27 (IsProbability)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P63 (logTwo)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P19 (outer)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P18 (bipartiteTensor)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P11 (Loewner)

/-- PDF p.9, Theorem 21 (abstract pp.1–2): some finite maximally entangled catalyst
works iff S_{1/2}<log K, excluding the identical nonzero spectrum, up to local unitaries.
The catalyst is returned exactly in tensor product with the target. Below the
threshold, every sufficiently large finite catalyst rank works, as in the proof. -/
theorem theorem21 {d : ℕ} (K : ℕ) (hK : 2 ≤ K) (lam : Fin d → ℝ)
    (hprob : IsProbability lam) (hnontrivial : ¬ IsUniformRank lam K) :
    (CatalyticPreparation K lam ↔ schmidtRenyi (1 / 2) lam < logTwo (K : ℝ)) ∧
    (schmidtRenyi (1 / 2) lam < logTwo (K : ℝ) →
      ∃ C0 : ℕ, 2 ≤ C0 ∧ ∀ C : ℕ, C0 ≤ C →
        Reach (bipartiteTensor (maximallyEntangledDensity C) (maximallyEntangledDensity K))
          (bipartiteTensor (maximallyEntangledDensity C) (schmidtDensity lam))) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95

end
Source
Pure-state transformations and catalysis under operations that completely preserve positivity of partial transpose, arXiv:0801.4322v2, PDF p. 9, Theorem 21: maximally entangled PPT catalysts, seed headline
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every natural number ddd, natural number K≥2K\ge 2K≥2, and function λ:{0,…,d−1}→R\lambda:\{0,\ldots,d-1\}\to\mathbb Rλ:{0,…,d−1}→R satisfying λi≥0\lambda_i\ge0λi​≥0 and ∑iλi=1\sum_i\lambda_i=1∑i​λi​=1, assume that it is not the case that exactly KKK entries are nonzero and every entry is either 000 or 1/K1/K1/K. (The probability assumptions cannot hold when d=0d=0d=0.) Define H1/2(λ)=2log⁡2(∑iλi)H_{1/2}(\lambda)=2\log_2(\sum_i\sqrt{\lambda_i})H1/2​(λ)=2log2​(∑i​λi​​), where log⁡2x=log⁡x/log⁡2\log_2 x=\log x/\log2log2​x=logx/log2; define the bipartite matrix ρλ\rho_\lambdaρλ​ by (ρλ)(i,j),(i′,j′)=λiλi′(\rho_\lambda)_{(i,j),(i',j')}=\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_{i'}}(ρλ​)(i,j),(i′,j′)​=λi​λi′​​ when i=ji=ji=j and i′=j′i'=j'i′=j′, and zero otherwise; and define Γm\Gamma_mΓm​ by (Γm)(i,j),(i′,j′)=1/m(\Gamma_m)_{(i,j),(i',j')}=1/m(Γm​)(i,j),(i′,j′)​=1/m under the same equality conditions, and zero otherwise. Here the bipartite tensor product groups the two left factors together and the two right factors together: (X⊗bipY)(a,c; b,e),(a′,c′; b′,e′)=X(a,b),(a′,b′)Y(c,e),(c′,e′)(X\otimes_{\mathrm{bip}}Y)_{(a,c;\,b,e),(a',c';\,b',e')}=X_{(a,b),(a',b')}Y_{(c,e),(c',e')}(X⊗bip​Y)(a,c;b,e),(a′,c′;b′,e′)​=X(a,b),(a′,b′)​Y(c,e),(c′,e′)​. An allowed conversion means that there exists a complex-linear map taking the specified input matrix exactly to the specified output matrix, preserving the trace of every matrix, and such that both the map and its composition with partial transpose on the right subsystem before and after the map are completely positive; complete positivity requires preservation of positive semidefiniteness under every finite identity amplification, including amplification dimension zero. Then an allowed conversion

ΓC⊗bipΓK⟼ΓC⊗bipρλ\Gamma_C\otimes_{\mathrm{bip}}\Gamma_K \longmapsto \Gamma_C\otimes_{\mathrm{bip}}\rho_\lambdaΓC​⊗bip​ΓK​⟼ΓC​⊗bip​ρλ​

exists for some natural number C≥2C\ge2C≥2 if and only if H1/2(λ)<log⁡2KH_{1/2}(\lambda)<\log_2KH1/2​(λ)<log2​K. Moreover, if this strict inequality holds, there exists a natural number C0≥2C_0\ge2C0​≥2 such that such an allowed conversion exists for every natural number C≥C0C\ge C_0C≥C0​, with the converting map permitted to depend on CCC.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me