Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Unknown-qubit transmission criterion and optimal cost

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P99.qubitCapability_cost

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

For a two-qubit unitary UUU, let β\betaβ be an actual interaction-content witness: UUU is locally equivalent, up to global phase, to Uβ=exp⁡[−i∑k=13βkσk⊗σk]U_\beta=\exp[-i\sum_{k=1}^3\beta_k\sigma_k\otimes\sigma_k]Uβ​=exp[−i∑k=13​βk​σk​⊗σk​], where σ1,σ2,σ3\sigma_1,\sigma_2,\sigma_3σ1​,σ2​,σ3​ are the Pauli matrices X,Y,ZX,Y,ZX,Y,Z and π/4≥β1≥β2≥∣β3∣\pi/4\ge\beta_1\ge\beta_2\ge|\beta_3|π/4≥β1​≥β2​≥∣β3​∣. Transmission means one use of the gate with normalized pure product inputs, without ancillas or prior shared entanglement. Encoding and decoding axes are free local choices fixed before the unknown input. Classical messages are encoded in orthogonal states and decoded with certainty; qubit transmission preserves every superposition with the same encoding and recovery. In simultaneous tasks, a receiver may choose its local decoder according to its own sent classical bit. An arbitrary unknown qubit can be transmitted from AAA to BBB exactly when β1=β2=π/4\beta_1=\beta_2=\pi/4β1​=β2​=π/4, and the same criterion holds in the opposite direction. Let HHH be a Hermitian Hamiltonian on two qubits A,BA,BA,B, with canonical interaction coefficients α=(α1,α2,α3)\alpha=(\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3)α=(α1​,α2​,α3​) satisfying α1≥α2≥∣α3∣\alpha_1\ge\alpha_2\ge|\alpha_3|α1​≥α2​≥∣α3​∣. Local terms in HHH are allowed. Local unitary controls are instantaneous and free, interaction intervals are nonnegative, and ℏ=1\hbar=1ℏ=1. Write CH(U)C_H(U)CH​(U) for the infimum of the interaction durations of protocols implementing the gate UUU, allowing the ideal limit of arbitrarily fine pulses at fixed total duration and disregarding global phase. This cost is an extended nonnegative real, with value +∞+\infty+∞ for an impossible simulation. For a transmission task TTT, write CH(T)=inf⁡{CH(V):V performs T}C_H(T)=\inf\{C_H(V):V\text{ performs }T\}CH​(T)=inf{CH​(V):V performs T}. An asserted optimal gate both performs the task and has an ideal simulation at the displayed time, and every capable gate has at least its cost. For α1>0\alpha_1>0α1​>0,

CH(qubitA→B)=π2(α1+α2),β∗=π4(1,1,2α3α1+α2).C_H(\mathrm{qubit}_{A\to B})=\frac{\pi}{2(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)},\qquad\beta_*=\frac{\pi}{4}\left(1,1,\frac{2\alpha_3}{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}\right).CH​(qubitA→B​)=2(α1​+α2​)π​,β∗​=4π​(1,1,α1​+α2​2α3​​).

The canonical gate with content β∗\beta_*β∗​ attains the bound in either chosen direction. The same fixed recovery preserves every normalized superposition, not just the two basis states.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P99
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P99

open scoped Matrix Kronecker NNReal ENNReal

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P10 (pauli)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P32 (evolution)

noncomputable section

/-- PDF pp.11–12, IV.B.3: unknown-qubit transmission has the same optimal content and
cost as Result 5; its criterion includes coherence for every superposition. -/
theorem qubitCapability_cost (U H : TwoMatrix) (b a : Triple)
    (hU : HasContent U b) (hH : HasCanonicalHamiltonian H a) (ha : 0 < a 0) :
    (CanQubit U ↔ b 0 = Real.pi / 4 ∧ b 1 = Real.pi / 4) ∧
    (CanQubit (reverseParties U) ↔ b 0 = Real.pi / 4 ∧ b 1 = Real.pi / 4) ∧
    HasContent (contentGate (optimalTransmissionContent a)) (optimalTransmissionContent a) ∧
    OptimalTask H CanQubit (contentGate (optimalTransmissionContent a))
      (Real.pi / (2 * (a 0 + a 1))) ∧
    OptimalTask H (fun V => CanQubit (reverseParties V))
      (contentGate (optimalTransmissionContent a)) (Real.pi / (2 * (a 0 + a 1))) := by sorry

end

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P99
Source
Characterization of non-local gates, arXiv:quant-ph/0205100v3, PDF p. 11, IV.B.3: transmitting a qubit
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For all complex two-qubit matrices U,HU,HU,H and real triples b,ab,ab,a, assume UUU is unitary, b1≤b0b_1\le b_0b1​≤b0​, ∣b2∣≤b1|b_2|\le b_1∣b2​∣≤b1​, b0≤π/4b_0\le\pi/4b0​≤π/4, and U=(A′⊗B′)exp⁡(−i∑jbjσj⊗σj)(C′⊗D′)U=(A'\otimes B')\exp(-i\sum_jb_j\sigma_j\otimes\sigma_j)(C'\otimes D')U=(A′⊗B′)exp(−i∑j​bj​σj​⊗σj​)(C′⊗D′) for some four one-qubit unitaries, where (σ0,σ1,σ2)=(X,Y,Z)(\sigma_0,\sigma_1,\sigma_2)=(X,Y,Z)(σ0​,σ1​,σ2​)=(X,Y,Z). Assume also H=H†H=H^\daggerH=H†, a1≤a0a_1\le a_0a1​≤a0​, ∣a2∣≤a1|a_2|\le a_1∣a2​∣≤a1​, a0>0a_0>0a0​>0, and there exist one-qubit unitaries A,BA,BA,B and Hermitian one-qubit matrices K,LK,LK,L with

(A⊗B)H(A⊗B)†=∑j=02ajσj⊗σj+K⊗I+I⊗L.(A\otimes B)H(A\otimes B)^\dagger =\sum_{j=0}^2a_j\sigma_j\otimes\sigma_j+K\otimes I+I\otimes L.(A⊗B)H(A⊗B)†=j=0∑2​aj​σj​⊗σj​+K⊗I+I⊗L.

Define Q(V)Q(V)Q(V) to mean that VVV is unitary and there exist one-qubit unitaries E,RE,RE,R and unit vectors v,w∈C2v,w\in\mathbb C^2v,w∈C2 such that, for every unit vector q∈C2q\in\mathbb C^2q∈C2, (I⊗R)V(Eq⊗v)=w⊗q(I\otimes R)V(Eq\otimes v)=w\otimes q(I⊗R)V(Eq⊗v)=w⊗q. With S∣i,j⟩=∣j,i⟩S|i,j\rangle=|j,i\rangleS∣i,j⟩=∣j,i⟩, the declaration asserts

Q(U)⟺(b0=π/4 and b1=π/4),Q(SUS)⟺(b0=π/4 and b1=π/4).Q(U)\Longleftrightarrow(b_0=\pi/4\ \text{and}\ b_1=\pi/4), \qquad Q(SUS)\Longleftrightarrow(b_0=\pi/4\ \text{and}\ b_1=\pi/4).Q(U)⟺(b0​=π/4 and b1​=π/4),Q(SUS)⟺(b0​=π/4 and b1​=π/4).

Put d=(π/4,π/4,(π/4) 2a2/(a0+a1))d=(\pi/4,\pi/4,(\pi/4)\,2a_2/(a_0+a_1))d=(π/4,π/4,(π/4)2a2​/(a0​+a1​)), Gd=exp⁡(−i∑jdjσj⊗σj)G_d=\exp(-i\sum_jd_j\sigma_j\otimes\sigma_j)Gd​=exp(−i∑j​dj​σj​⊗σj​), and t∗=π/(2(a0+a1))t_*=\pi/(2(a_0+a_1))t∗​=π/(2(a0​+a1​)); the assumptions imply a0+a1>0a_0+a_1>0a0​+a1​>0. The matrix GdG_dGd​ is unitary, d1≤d0d_1\le d_0d1​≤d0​, ∣d2∣≤d1|d_2|\le d_1∣d2​∣≤d1​, d0≤π/4d_0\le\pi/4d0​≤π/4, and there are four one-qubit unitaries L1,L2,R1,R2L_1,L_2,R_1,R_2L1​,L2​,R1​,R2​ such that Gd=(L1⊗L2)Gd(R1⊗R2)G_d=(L_1\otimes L_2)G_d(R_1\otimes R_2)Gd​=(L1​⊗L2​)Gd​(R1​⊗R2​). Define CH(V)C_H(V)CH​(V) as the extended nonnegative infimum, with empty infimum +∞+\infty+∞, of times t≥0t\ge0t≥0 for which VVV is unitary and every ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0 admits a finite product (Am⊗Bm)e−itmH⋯(A1⊗B1)e−it1H(A0⊗B0)(A_m\otimes B_m)e^{-it_mH}\cdots(A_1\otimes B_1)e^{-it_1H}(A_0\otimes B_0)(Am​⊗Bm​)e−itm​H⋯(A1​⊗B1​)e−it1​H(A0​⊗B0​), with one-qubit unitaries and nonnegative durations summing exactly to ttt, at operator-norm distance strictly less than ε\varepsilonε from zVzVzV for some ∣z∣=1|z|=1∣z∣=1; zero pulses are allowed. For each predicate P(V)=Q(V)P(V)=Q(V)P(V)=Q(V) and P(V)=Q(SVS)P(V)=Q(SVS)P(V)=Q(SVS), P(Gd)P(G_d)P(Gd​) holds, this arbitrarily accurate simulation is possible at the exact time t∗t_*t∗​, and

CH(Gd)=t∗,inf⁡{V:P(V)}CH(V)=t∗,∀V, P(V)⟹CH(Gd)≤CH(V).C_H(G_d)=t_*, \qquad \inf_{\{V:P(V)\}}C_H(V)=t_*, \qquad \forall V,\ P(V)\Longrightarrow C_H(G_d)\le C_H(V).CH​(Gd​)=t∗​,{V:P(V)}inf​CH​(V)=t∗​,∀V, P(V)⟹CH​(Gd​)≤CH​(V).
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me