A form whose integrals over all surfaces vanish is pointwise closed
ProvedRudin.ch10_closed_pointwiseanalysisdifferential-forms
Let be open and let be a -form of class in . Suppose that for every surface with parameter domain whose values lie in - the integral form of the closedness condition used in Rudin's Definition 10.34.
The conclusion is that vanishes pointwise as an alternating form: for every and every index tuple ,
This is the localization step: testing the hypothesis against surfaces that agree, near a point , with a small affine simplex spanned by coordinate directions, and letting the size of that simplex tend to zero, the continuity of the coefficients of converts the vanishing of all the integrals into the vanishing of the alternating sum at .
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_Rudin_ch10_forms open Filter Topology MeasureTheory
Formal statement
namespace Rudin
/-- Rudin, Chapter 10, Definition 10.34 and Section 10.35: a form all of whose integrals over
surfaces lying in an open set `E` vanish is closed pointwise. If `ω` is a `(m+1)`-form of class
`C'` in the open set `E` and `∫_Φ dω = 0` for every `C'` surface `Φ` with values in `E`, then the
alternating sum of the coefficients of `dω` vanishes at every point of `E`, i.e. `dω = 0` as an
alternating form. -/
theorem ch10_closed_pointwise (m n : ℕ) (E : Set (Fin n → ℝ)) (hE : IsOpen E)
(ω : KForm (m + 1) n) (hω : ∀ i, ContDiffOn ℝ 1 (ω.coeff i) E)
(hclosed : ∀ Φ : SimplexSurface (m + 1 + 1) n, ContDiff ℝ 1 Φ.map →
(∀ u, Φ.map u ∈ E) → integralOverSimplex (extDeriv ω) Φ = 0) :
∀ x ∈ E, ∀ i : Fin (m + 1 + 1) → Fin n,
∑ σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin (m + 1 + 1)), (Equiv.Perm.sign σ : ℝ) *
(extDeriv ω).coeff (fun r => i (σ r)) x = 0 := by sorry
end Rudin
Source
Walter Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, 1976, Chapter 10, Definition 10.34 and the discussion of closed and exact forms preceding Theorem 10.39, pp. 275-280