Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

A form whose integrals over all surfaces vanish is pointwise closed

Proved
Rudin.ch10_closed_pointwise

by Lucas · Sep 19, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

analysisdifferential-forms

Let E⊆RnE \subseteq \mathbb{R}^nE⊆Rn be open and let ω\omegaω be a (m+1)(m+1)(m+1)-form of class C′C'C′ in EEE. Suppose that ∫Φdω=0\int_\Phi d\omega = 0∫Φ​dω=0 for every C′C'C′ surface Φ\PhiΦ with parameter domain Qm+2Q^{m+2}Qm+2 whose values lie in EEE - the integral form of the closedness condition dω=0d\omega = 0dω=0 used in Rudin's Definition 10.34.

The conclusion is that dωd\omegadω vanishes pointwise as an alternating form: for every x∈Ex \in Ex∈E and every index tuple iii,

∑σ∈Sm+2sgn⁡(σ) (dω)i∘σ(x)=0.\sum_{\sigma \in S_{m+2}} \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)\,(d\omega)_{i\circ\sigma}(x) = 0 .σ∈Sm+2​∑​sgn(σ)(dω)i∘σ​(x)=0.

This is the localization step: testing the hypothesis against surfaces that agree, near a point x∈Ex \in Ex∈E, with a small affine simplex spanned by coordinate directions, and letting the size of that simplex tend to zero, the continuity of the coefficients of dωd\omegadω converts the vanishing of all the integrals into the vanishing of the alternating sum at xxx.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_Rudin_ch10_forms

open Filter Topology MeasureTheory
Formal statement
namespace Rudin

/-- Rudin, Chapter 10, Definition 10.34 and Section 10.35: a form all of whose integrals over
surfaces lying in an open set `E` vanish is closed pointwise.  If `ω` is a `(m+1)`-form of class
`C'` in the open set `E` and `∫_Φ dω = 0` for every `C'` surface `Φ` with values in `E`, then the
alternating sum of the coefficients of `dω` vanishes at every point of `E`, i.e. `dω = 0` as an
alternating form. -/
theorem ch10_closed_pointwise (m n : ℕ) (E : Set (Fin n → ℝ)) (hE : IsOpen E)
    (ω : KForm (m + 1) n) (hω : ∀ i, ContDiffOn ℝ 1 (ω.coeff i) E)
    (hclosed : ∀ Φ : SimplexSurface (m + 1 + 1) n, ContDiff ℝ 1 Φ.map →
      (∀ u, Φ.map u ∈ E) → integralOverSimplex (extDeriv ω) Φ = 0) :
    ∀ x ∈ E, ∀ i : Fin (m + 1 + 1) → Fin n,
      ∑ σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin (m + 1 + 1)), (Equiv.Perm.sign σ : ℝ) *
        (extDeriv ω).coeff (fun r => i (σ r)) x = 0 := by sorry

end Rudin
Source
Walter Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, 1976, Chapter 10, Definition 10.34 and the discussion of closed and exact forms preceding Theorem 10.39, pp. 275-280

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, licensed under Apache 2.0.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTermsJoin SlackJoin Zulip© 2026 Prove2Me