Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 2.1 — (Nemhauser et al.) v is non-decreasing submodular iff v(T) ≤ v(S) + Σ_{g∈T∖S} v(g | S)

Proved
RoundRobinEq.SubmodularEF1.theorem_2_1

by mikedeng1 · Oct 14, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

p2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1set-functionssubmodular

Let MMM be a finite set of goods and v:2M→R≥0v:2^M\to\mathbb R_{\ge0}v:2M→R≥0​ a non-negative set function, with marginal values v(g∣S)=v(S∪{g})−v(S)v(g\mid S)=v(S\cup\{g\})-v(S)v(g∣S)=v(S∪{g})−v(S). Then vvv is non-decreasing and submodular if and only if

v(T) ≤ v(S)+∑g∈T∖Sv(g∣S)for all S,T⊆M.v(T)\ \le\ v(S)+\sum_{g\in T\setminus S} v(g\mid S)\qquad\text{for all } S,T\subseteq M .v(T) ≤ v(S)+g∈T∖S∑​v(g∣S)for all S,T⊆M.

This characterization of monotone submodular functions, due to Nemhauser, Wolsey and Fisher, is the first step of the closing bound in the proof of Theorem 4.4, where it bounds the value of a bundle by the value of agent iii's deviation bundle plus a sum of marginal values.

Formalization Note vvv is a real-valued function on Finset M with the hypothesis v(S)≥0v(S)\ge0v(S)≥0 for all SSS (the paper's codomain R≥0\mathbb R_{\ge0}R≥0​); normalization v(∅)=0v(\emptyset)=0v(∅)=0 is not assumed, as in the paper's statement. "Submodular" is the marginal form of p. 5 (IsSubmodular).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_RoundRobinEq_SubmodularEF1_Setting
Formal statement
namespace RoundRobinEq.SubmodularEF1

/-- Theorem 2.1 (Nemhauser et al.), p. 5: a function `v : 2^M → ℝ≥0` is non-decreasing and
submodular iff `v(T) ≤ v(S) + ∑_{g ∈ T \ S} v(g | S)` for all `S, T ⊆ M`. -/
theorem theorem_2_1 {M : Type} [Fintype M] [DecidableEq M] (v : Finset M → ℝ)
    (hv : ∀ S, 0 ≤ v S) :
    (IsNonDecreasing v ∧ IsSubmodular v) ↔
      ∀ S T : Finset M, v T ≤ v S + ∑ g ∈ T \ S, marginal v {g} S := by sorry

end RoundRobinEq.SubmodularEF1
Source
Amanatidis et al., Round-Robin Beyond Additive Agents, arXiv:2301.13652v1, p. 5, Theorem 2.1
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 14, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 14, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me