Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Nondegenerate asymptotic operators with equal Conley–Zehnder index are homotopic through nondegenerate ones

Proved
CauchyRiemannIndex.asymptoticCZIndex_eq_iff_joined

by Mazecto · Oct 13, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

cauchy-riemannconley-zehnder-indexfredholm-indexsobolev-spacessymplectic-geometry

Let S0S_0S0​, S1S_1S1​ be continuous loops of symmetric matrices whose asymptotic operators −J0∂t−S0-J_0\partial_t-S_0−J0​∂t​−S0​, −J0∂t−S1-J_0\partial_t-S_1−J0​∂t​−S1​ are nondegenerate. Then μCZ(−J0∂t−S0)=μCZ(−J0∂t−S1)\mu_{CZ}(-J_0\partial_t-S_0)=\mu_{CZ}(-J_0\partial_t-S_1)μCZ​(−J0​∂t​−S0​)=μCZ​(−J0​∂t​−S1​) if and only if there is a continuous family (Sτ)τ∈[0,1](S_\tau)_{\tau\in[0,1]}(Sτ​)τ∈[0,1]​ of loops of symmetric matrices from S0S_0S0​ to S1S_1S1​ such that every −J0∂t−Sτ-J_0\partial_t-S_\tau−J0​∂t​−Sτ​ is nondegenerate.

Formalization Note The family is a continuous map H : C(unitInterval × ℝ, Mat n) with IsSymLoop (H (τ, ·)) and IsNondegenerate (H (τ, ·)) for every τ\tauτ. Wendl states the theorem for the space of smooth asymptotic operators on a Hermitian bundle with a trivialization; here the bundle is trivial and the loops are continuous.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_CauchyRiemannIndex_Setting
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
Formal statement
namespace CauchyRiemannIndex

open MeasureTheory Matrix Filter Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal ContDiff RealInnerProductSpace

/-- Wendl, Theorem 3.34 (p. 62), trivial bundle: two nondegenerate loops `S₀`, `S₁` of symmetric
matrices have the same Conley–Zehnder index `μ_CZ(-J₀ ∂ₜ - S)` if and only if they are joined by
a continuous family of nondegenerate loops of symmetric matrices. -/
theorem asymptoticCZIndex_eq_iff_joined (n : ℕ) (S₀ S₁ : ℝ → Mat n) (h₀ : IsSymLoop S₀)
    (h₁ : IsSymLoop S₁) (hn₀ : IsNondegenerate S₀) (hn₁ : IsNondegenerate S₁) :
    asymptoticCZIndex S₀ = asymptoticCZIndex S₁ ↔
      ∃ H : C(unitInterval × ℝ, Mat n), (∀ t, H (0, t) = S₀ t) ∧ (∀ t, H (1, t) = S₁ t) ∧
        ∀ τ, IsSymLoop (fun t => H (τ, t)) ∧ IsNondegenerate (fun t => H (τ, t)) := by
  sorry

end CauchyRiemannIndex
Source
C. Wendl, Lectures on Symplectic Field Theory, arXiv:1612.01009, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01009, Lecture 3, Theorem 3.34, p. 62 (trivial bundle)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Read-back: CauchyRiemannIndex.asymptoticCZIndex_eq_iff_joined

Setting. n∈Nn\in\mathbb Nn∈N; S0,S1:R→R2n×2nS_0,S_1:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R^{2n\times2n}S0​,S1​:R→R2n×2n.

Hypotheses. S0,S1S_0,S_1S0​,S1​ are continuous, 1-periodic, pointwise symmetric (IsSymLoop) and nondegenerate (IsNondegenerate: det⁡(I−Ψi(1))≠0\det(I-\Psi_i(1))\ne0det(I−Ψi​(1))=0 for the fundamental solution Ψi′=J0SiΨi\Psi_i'=J_0S_i\Psi_iΨi′​=J0​Si​Ψi​, Ψi(0)=I\Psi_i(0)=IΨi​(0)=I).

Definitions used.

  • asymptoticCZIndex S = the kkk with IsAsymptoticCZValue S k (chosen; fallback 0): there is a fundamental solution Ψ\PsiΨ of SSS and the path ψ=Ψ∣[0,1]\psi=\Psi|_{[0,1]}ψ=Ψ∣[0,1]​ has IsCZValue ψ k.
  • IsCZValue ψ k: there is a path χ\chiχ in Sp∗={A∈Sp(2n):det⁡(I−A)≠0}\mathrm{Sp}^*=\{A\in\mathrm{Sp}(2n):\det(I-A)\ne0\}Sp∗={A∈Sp(2n):det(I−A)=0} from ψ(1)\psi(1)ψ(1) to W+=−IW^+=-IW+=−I or W−=diag⁡(2,−1,…,−1,12,−1,…,−1)W^-=\operatorname{diag}(2,-1,\dots,-1,\tfrac12,-1,\dots,-1)W−=diag(2,−1,…,−1,21​,−1,…,−1), and continuous arguments θ1,θ2\theta_1,\theta_2θ1​,θ2​ of ρ^∘ψ\hat\rho\circ\psiρ^​∘ψ, ρ^∘χ\hat\rho\circ\chiρ^​∘χ with 2[(θ1(1)−θ1(0))+(θ2(1)−θ2(0))]=2πk2[(\theta_1(1)-\theta_1(0))+(\theta_2(1)-\theta_2(0))]=2\pi k2[(θ1​(1)−θ1​(0))+(θ2​(1)−θ2​(0))]=2πk, where ρ^(A)=det⁡CCA/∣det⁡CCA∣\hat\rho(A)=\det_{\mathbb C}C_A/|\det_{\mathbb C}C_A|ρ^​(A)=detC​CA​/∣detC​CA​∣, CA=12(A−J0AJ0)C_A=\tfrac12(A-J_0AJ_0)CA​=21​(A−J0​AJ0​), det⁡C\det_{\mathbb C}detC​ of X+iYX+iYX+iY for C_A=\begin{psmallmatrix}X&-Y\\Y&X\end{psmallmatrix} (blocks toBlocks₁₁, toBlocks₂₁, checked). This is Gutt's deg⁡(ρ^2∘ψ~)\deg(\hat\rho^2\circ\tilde\psi)deg(ρ^​2∘ψ~​).

Conclusion.

μCZ(S0)=μCZ(S1)  ⟺  ∃H∈C([0,1]×R,R2n×2n): H(0,⋅)=S0, H(1,⋅)=S1, ∀τ, H(τ,⋅) is a continuous 1-periodic symmetric nondegenerate loop.\mu_{CZ}(S_0)=\mu_{CZ}(S_1)\iff\exists H\in C([0,1]\times\mathbb R,\mathbb R^{2n\times2n}):\ H(0,\cdot)=S_0,\ H(1,\cdot)=S_1,\ \forall\tau,\ H(\tau,\cdot)\text{ is a continuous 1-periodic symmetric nondegenerate loop.}μCZ​(S0​)=μCZ​(S1​)⟺∃H∈C([0,1]×R,R2n×2n): H(0,⋅)=S0​, H(1,⋅)=S1​, ∀τ, H(τ,⋅) is a continuous 1-periodic symmetric nondegenerate loop.

Degenerate cases. n=0n=0n=0: every index is 0 and HHH constant works; both sides true. S0=S1S_0=S_1S0​=S1​: both sides true (constant HHH).

Remarks. Joint continuity of HHH on [0,1]×R[0,1]\times\mathbb R[0,1]×R with periodic slices is equivalent to a continuous path in the space of loops with the uniform topology, which is the natural topology for Wendl's Thm 3.34 (stated there for asymptotic operators; on the trivial bundle these are exactly −J0∂t−S-J_0\partial_t-S−J0​∂t​−S). The "⇒" direction asks for a family of genuinely periodic symmetric loops (not merely a homotopy of the paths Ψ\PsiΨ through nondegenerate paths); this is the stronger claim, and it is what Wendl 3.34 asserts. Not a mis-formalization.

Soundness checks.

  1. Junk values: czIndex/asymptoticCZIndex fall back to 0 only when no value exists; for a nondegenerate continuous loop Ψ\PsiΨ exists, is unique, is symplectic (J0SJ_0SJ0​S Hamiltonian), Ψ(1)∈Sp∗\Psi(1)\in\mathrm{Sp}^*Ψ(1)∈Sp∗, and CAC_ACA​ is invertible on Sp\mathrm{Sp}Sp, so a value exists. Uniqueness of the value: W+W^+W+, W−W^-W− lie in different components of Sp∗\mathrm{Sp}^*Sp∗ (det⁡(I−W+)=22n>0\det(I-W^+)=2^{2n}>0det(I−W+)=22n>0, det⁡(I−W−)<0\det(I-W^-)<0det(I−W−)<0), so two extensions end at the same point and differ by a loop in Sp∗\mathrm{Sp}^*Sp∗, along which deg⁡ρ^2=0\deg\hat\rho^2=0degρ^​2=0 (Gutt); lifts are unique up to constants. So choose returns the genuine index. Coercion unitInterval → ℝ in ψ t = Ψ t is the subtype coercion. τ\tauτ ranges over unitInterval.
  2. Hand checks: S=εIS=\varepsilon IS=εI (n=1n=1n=1, 0<ε<π0<\varepsilon<\pi0<ε<π): Ψ(t)\Psi(t)Ψ(t) = rotation by εt\varepsilon tεt, ρ^=eiεt\hat\rho=e^{i\varepsilon t}ρ^​=eiεt; extend by rotations to −I-I−I: total argument change π\piπ, so μ=1\mu=1μ=1. S=diag⁡(1,−1)S=\operatorname{diag}(1,-1)S=diag(1,−1): \Psi(t)=\begin{psmallmatrix}\cosh t&\sinh t\\ \sinh t&\cosh t\end{psmallmatrix}, CΨ=cosh⁡t IC_\Psi=\cosh t\,ICΨ​=coshtI, ρ^≡1\hat\rho\equiv1ρ^​≡1; extension inside positive hyperbolic symmetric matrices to W−W^-W− keeps ρ^≡1\hat\rho\equiv1ρ^​≡1; μ=0\mu=0μ=0. These two loops have different indices and indeed cannot be joined through nondegenerate loops (the path endpoint would have to cross from trace <2<2<2 to trace >2>2>2 through eigenvalue 1). Consistent. Statement is not vacuous and is true (Wendl Thm 3.34; Robbin–Salamon/Gutt classification of nondegenerate paths).

Verdict: no mis-formalization observed

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 14, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Oct 14, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me