Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 4.10 — no truthful additive mechanism is a ccc-approximation for task scheduling for any c<nc<nc<n

Proved
AlgMechDesign.Additive.no_additive_mechanism_below_n

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

lower-boundmechanism-designp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1scheduling

Consider task scheduling with n≥1n\ge 1n≥1 agents and k≥n2k \ge n^2k≥n2 tasks. Let m=(x,p)m=(x,p)m=(x,p) be a truthful direct mechanism whose prices are additive: pi(X,t−i)=∑j∈Xpi({j},t−i)p^i(X,t^{-i}) = \sum_{j\in X} p^i(\{j\},t^{-i})pi(X,t−i)=∑j∈X​pi({j},t−i) for every agent iii, positive type vector ttt and set of tasks XXX. Then for every real c<nc < nc<n the allocation rule is not a ccc-approximation: there are a positive type vector ttt and an allocation yyy with

g(x(t),t)>c⋅g(y,t).g\bigl(x(t),t\bigr) > c\cdot g(y,t).g(x(t),t)>c⋅g(y,t).

By the revelation principle the same holds for every mechanism whose truthful implementation is additive. The bound is tight: the MinWork mechanism, which gives each task to the fastest agent and pays it the second-best time, is truthful, additive and an nnn-approximation.

Formalization Note The threshold k≥n2k\ge n^2k≥n2 is the one the paper's proof uses ("Let k≥n2k \ge n^2k≥n2"); the theorem's printed statement does not mention kkk. The statement is kept for every n≥1n\ge 1n≥1 ([NeZero n]); at n=1n=1n=1 it holds because every allocation is the same. Truthfulness and additivity quantify over positive types; running time is not modelled.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_AlgMechDesign_Additive_Model
import Definitions.Def_AlgMechDesign_Additive_Price
Formal statement
namespace AlgMechDesign.Additive

/-- Theorem 4.10, p. 180: for `n ≥ 1` agents and `k ≥ n²` tasks, no truthful additive mechanism
for task scheduling is a `c`-approximation for any `c < n`. -/
theorem no_additive_mechanism_below_n {n k : ℕ} [NeZero n] (hk : n ^ 2 ≤ k)
    (alloc : (Fin n → Fin k → ℝ) → (Fin k → Fin n))
    (pay : (Fin n → Fin k → ℝ) → Fin n → ℝ) (htr : IsTruthful alloc pay)
    (hadd : IsAdditive alloc pay) (c : ℝ) (hc : c < n) :
    ¬ IsApprox c alloc := by sorry

end AlgMechDesign.Additive
Source
Nisan, Ronen, Algorithmic Mechanism Design, Games Econ. Behav. 35, 2001, p. 180, Theorem 4.10
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me