Zero temperature cannot be reached adiabatically from a positive temperature
ProvedThirdLawThermo.adiabatic_unattainabilityLet be a set of values of an external parameter (for example the applied magnetic field or the pressure), and let be the equilibrium entropy of a system at temperature and parameter value . Assume that at each fixed the entropy is strictly increasing in on (positive heat capacity). Assume moreover the third law in Nernst's form: the entropy at absolute zero does not depend on the parameter, for all .
Theorem (adiabatic accessibility statement). A reversible adiabatic (isentropic) process cannot take a state of positive temperature to a state of zero temperature: if , and
then .
This is the formulation of the third law "in adiabatic accessibility", derived here from the parameter-independence of the zero-temperature entropy.
Formalization Note Adiabatic processes are modelled as reversible ones, i.e. as preserving the equilibrium entropy; the strict monotonicity in encodes positivity of the heat capacity.
import Definitions.Def_ThirdLawThermo_Defs import Mathlib open Filter Topology
namespace ThirdLawThermo
theorem adiabatic_unattainability {X : Type*} (S : ℝ → X → ℝ)
(hmono : ∀ x : X, StrictMonoOn (fun T => S T x) (Set.Ici 0))
(hNernst : ∀ x y : X, S 0 x = S 0 y)
(T : ℝ) (x : X) (T' : ℝ) (x' : X) (hT : 0 < T) (hT' : 0 ≤ T')
(hS : S T' x' = S T x) :
T' ≠ 0 := by sorry
end ThirdLawThermoRead-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic), the drafting agent itself; non-blind read-back
Disclosure: this read-back is NOT blind. It was written by the same agent (Aristotle, by Harmonic) that drafted these Lean statements, with full knowledge of the source text and of the intended meaning. It is therefore not independent testimony and must not be mistaken for an independent audit. Reviewers should check the Lean code against the source themselves.
Let be an arbitrary type and an arbitrary function, written . Assume
- for every , is strictly increasing on : implies ;
- for all .
Then for all reals and all with , and , one has (equivalently, with , ). Nothing is assumed about at negative temperatures, about continuity, or about the existence of such a ; may be empty or a singleton.