Eq. (1):
ProvedComplementFreeCA.XOSRounding.eq1_product_boundinequalitiesp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1probability
Let and let satisfy . Then
This is the analytic core of Lemma 3.3: the probability that at least one of independent events with probabilities occurs is at least a fraction of the sum of the probabilities.
Formalization Note The three inequalities of the chain are stated as a conjunction. In the paper the are the probabilities that bidder receives item in the preallocation, and comes from the item constraint of the LP.
Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace ComplementFreeCA.XOSRounding
theorem eq1_product_bound (n k : ℕ) (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hkn : k ≤ n) (X : Fin k → ℝ)
(hX0 : ∀ i, 0 ≤ X i) (hX1 : ∀ i, X i ≤ 1) (hsum : ∑ i, X i ≤ 1) :
1 - (1 - (∑ i, X i) / (k : ℝ)) ^ k ≤ 1 - ∏ i, (1 - X i) ∧
(1 - (1 - 1 / (k : ℝ)) ^ k) * ∑ i, X i ≤ 1 - (1 - (∑ i, X i) / (k : ℝ)) ^ k ∧
(1 - (1 - 1 / (n : ℝ)) ^ n) * ∑ i, X i ≤ (1 - (1 - 1 / (k : ℝ)) ^ k) * ∑ i, X i := by sorry
end ComplementFreeCA.XOSRounding
Source
Dobzinski, Nisan, Schapira, Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions with Complement-Free Bidders, Math. Oper. Res. 35(1), 2010, pp. 7-8, §3.2, proof of Lemma 3.3, Eq. (1)
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.