Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

If 1, v, v̄, g, vg are free and ḡ ∈ span(1, v, vg) for a Laurent g, their span is span(1, v, v̄, h, h̄) with h = G(v) + κ · conj(v G(v)), |κ| = 1

Proved
DiazModulus.laurent_degree_one_conj_stable_space_real_pencil_normal_form

by carlok · Oct 18, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

diaz-modulus-leannumber-theorytranscendence

Let v∈C∖Q‾v \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \overline{\mathbb{Q}}v∈C∖Q​ with vvˉ=1v\bar v = 1vvˉ=1. Let N≥0N \geq 0N≥0, F∈Q‾[X]F \in \overline{\mathbb{Q}}[X]F∈Q​[X] and g=F(v)/vNg = F(v)/v^Ng=F(v)/vN. Suppose 1,v,vˉ,g,vg1, v, \bar v, g, vg1,v,vˉ,g,vg are linearly independent over Q‾\overline{\mathbb{Q}}Q​ and gˉ∈spanQ‾(1,v,vg)\bar g \in \mathrm{span}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}(1, v, vg)gˉ​∈spanQ​​(1,v,vg), and let W=spanQ‾(1,v,vˉ,g,vg)W = \mathrm{span}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}(1, v, \bar v, g, vg)W=spanQ​​(1,v,vˉ,g,vg). Then there are κ∈Q‾\kappa \in \overline{\mathbb{Q}}κ∈Q​ with κκˉ=1\kappa\bar\kappa = 1κκˉ=1 and G∈Q‾[X]G \in \overline{\mathbb{Q}}[X]G∈Q​[X] with G(0)=0G(0) = 0G(0)=0 such that deg⁡G≥2\deg G \geq 2degG≥2 or v2∈Wv^2 \in Wv2∈W, and W=spanQ‾(1,v,vˉ,h,hˉ)W = \mathrm{span}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}(1, v, \bar v, h, \bar h)W=spanQ​​(1,v,vˉ,h,hˉ) for h=G(v)+κ vG(v)‾h = G(v) + \kappa\,\overline{vG(v)}h=G(v)+κvG(v)​.

Proof. Write gˉ=a+bv+c vg\bar g = a + bv + c\,vggˉ​=a+bv+cvg with a,b,c∈Q‾a, b, c \in \overline{\mathbb{Q}}a,b,c∈Q​. Conjugating once more and using vvˉ=1v\bar v = 1vvˉ=1 gives (aˉ+cˉb)+(bˉ+cˉa)vˉ+(ccˉ−1)g=0(\bar a + \bar cb) + (\bar b + \bar ca)\bar v + (c\bar c - 1)g = 0(aˉ+cˉb)+(bˉ+cˉa)vˉ+(ccˉ−1)g=0, so ccˉ=1c\bar c = 1ccˉ=1 and a=−cbˉa = -c\bar ba=−cbˉ by freeness. Then g1=g−bˉvˉ=(XF−bˉXN)(v)/vN+1g_1 = g - \bar b\bar v = (XF - \bar bX^N)(v)/v^{N+1}g1​=g−bˉvˉ=(XF−bˉXN)(v)/vN+1 satisfies gˉ1=c vg1\bar g_1 = c\,vg_1gˉ​1​=cvg1​, and DiazModulus.laurent_conj_twisted_symmetric_normal_form gives GGG with G(0)=0G(0) = 0G(0)=0 and g1≡hg_1 \equiv hg1​≡h modulo span(1,vˉ)\mathrm{span}(1, \bar v)span(1,vˉ), where h=G(v)+κ vG(v)‾h = G(v) + \kappa\,\overline{vG(v)}h=G(v)+κvG(v)​ and κ=cˉ\kappa = \bar cκ=cˉ; the identity vh=κhˉvh = \kappa\bar hvh=κhˉ then shows that 1,v,vˉ,g,vg1, v, \bar v, g, vg1,v,vˉ,g,vg and 1,v,vˉ,h,hˉ1, v, \bar v, h, \bar h1,v,vˉ,h,hˉ span the same space. If deg⁡G≤1\deg G \leq 1degG≤1, then G=a1XG = a_1XG=a1​X: a1=0a_1 = 0a1​=0 would put ggg in span(1,vˉ)\mathrm{span}(1, \bar v)span(1,vˉ), against freeness, and a1≠0a_1 \neq 0a1​=0 gives hˉ=aˉ1vˉ+ca1v2\bar h = \bar a_1\bar v + ca_1v^2hˉ=aˉ1​vˉ+ca1​v2, so v2∈Wv^2 \in Wv2∈W.

Novelty. Not found in the sources read in this form; routine. It is the Laurent form of DiazModulus.conj_equivariant_degree_one_space_eq_real_pencil_space.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
Formal statement
open Complex ComplexConjugate

namespace DiazModulus

theorem laurent_degree_one_conj_stable_space_real_pencil_normal_form
    (v : ℂ) (hv : v ∉ Qbar) (hv1 : v * conj v = 1)
    (N : ℕ) (F : Polynomial ↥Qbar)
    (hind : LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) ![1, v, conj v, (Polynomial.aeval v F / v ^ N), v * (Polynomial.aeval v F / v ^ N)])
    (hcg : conj (Polynomial.aeval v F / v ^ N) ∈ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, v, v * (Polynomial.aeval v F / v ^ N)} : Set ℂ)) :
    ∃ κ : ℂ, κ ∈ Qbar ∧ κ * conj κ = 1 ∧ ∃ G : Polynomial ↥Qbar, G.coeff 0 = 0 ∧
      (2 ≤ G.natDegree ∨ v ^ 2 ∈ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, v, conj v, (Polynomial.aeval v F / v ^ N), v * (Polynomial.aeval v F / v ^ N)} : Set ℂ)) ∧
      Submodule.span Qbar ({1, v, conj v, (Polynomial.aeval v F / v ^ N), v * (Polynomial.aeval v F / v ^ N)} : Set ℂ) =
        Submodule.span Qbar ({1, v, conj v, Polynomial.aeval v G + κ * conj (v * Polynomial.aeval v G), conj (Polynomial.aeval v G + κ * conj (v * Polynomial.aeval v G))} : Set ℂ) := by
  sorry

end DiazModulus
Source
Not found in the sources read in this form; the Laurent form of DiazModulus.conj_equivariant_degree_one_space_eq_real_pencil_space. Uses DiazModulus.laurent_conj_twisted_symmetric_normal_form. R18 of the Diaz modulus mission. Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 18 October 2026 (C. Perassi).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me