Appendix, Eq. (31): if , the retailer is better off
ProvedFalseFailureReturns.TargetRebate.retailer_gain_cornercontractsp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1supply-chain
Let , , , with , and let . Let with , and coordinate the supply chain, and suppose the decentralized effort is at the minimum, . Then the retailer's gain is nonnegative:
This is the second of the two cases of the retailer half of Proposition 2.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_FalseFailureReturns_TargetRebate_Model import Definitions.Def_FalseFailureReturns_TargetRebate_UniformRebate
Formal statement
namespace FalseFailureReturns.TargetRebate
theorem retailer_gain_corner (P : Params) (T u : ℝ)
(ha : 0 < P.a) (hβ : 0 < P.β) (hM : 0 < P.Mm) (hR : 0 < P.Rr)
(hint : P.a < (P.Mm + P.Rr) * P.β) (hu : 0 < u) (hT : 0 < T)
(hTlt : T < 2 * P.β / coordEffort P) (hcoord : Coordinates P T u)
(hD : decentrEffort P = 1) :
0 ≤ rebateRetailerProfit P T u (coordEffort P) - retailerProfit P (decentrEffort P) := by sorry
end FalseFailureReturns.TargetRebate
Source
Ferguson, Guide & Souza, Supply Chain Coordination for False Failure Returns, MSOM 8(4) 2006, pp. 392–393, Appendix, Eq. (31)
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.