Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Achievable hybrid rate for the displayed opposite-parity family

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P11.hybrid_ratePair

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let p0,p1≥0p_0,p_1\ge0p0​,p1​≥0 sum to one, and let αi,βi∈C\alpha_i,\beta_i\in\mathbb Cαi​,βi​∈C satisfy ∣αi∣2+∣βi∣2=1|\alpha_i|^2+|\beta_i|^2=1∣αi​∣2+∣βi​∣2=1. Consider the displayed family

∣ϕ0⟩=α0∣00⟩+β0∣11⟩,∣ϕ1⟩=α1∣01⟩+β1∣10⟩.|\phi_0\rangle=\alpha_0|00\rangle+\beta_0|11\rangle,\qquad |\phi_1\rangle=\alpha_1|01\rangle+\beta_1|10\rangle.∣ϕ0​⟩=α0​∣00⟩+β0​∣11⟩,∣ϕ1​⟩=α1​∣01⟩+β1​∣10⟩.

Write ρ=∑ipi∣ϕi⟩⟨ϕi∣\rho=\sum_i p_i|\phi_i\rangle\langle\phi_i|ρ=∑i​pi​∣ϕi​⟩⟨ϕi​∣ and ρB=Tr⁡Aρ\rho_B=\operatorname{Tr}_A\rhoρB​=TrA​ρ. On measuring Alice in the computational basis, let qjq_jqj​ be the probability of outcome jjj, and ωj\omega_jωj​ Bob's conditional density. Explicitly,

q0=∑ipi∣αi∣2,q1=∑ipi∣βi∣2,ω0=q0−1∑ipi∣αi∣2∣i⟩⟨i∣,ω1=q1−1∑ipi∣βi∣2∣1−i⟩⟨1−i∣.\begin{aligned} q_0&=\sum_i p_i|\alpha_i|^2,&q_1&=\sum_i p_i|\beta_i|^2,\\ \omega_0&=q_0^{-1}\sum_i p_i|\alpha_i|^2|i\rangle\langle i|,& \omega_1&=q_1^{-1}\sum_i p_i|\beta_i|^2|1-i\rangle\langle1-i|. \end{aligned}q0​ω0​​=i∑​pi​∣αi​∣2,=q0−1​i∑​pi​∣αi​∣2∣i⟩⟨i∣,​q1​ω1​​=i∑​pi​∣βi​∣2,=q1−1​i∑​pi​∣βi​∣2∣1−i⟩⟨1−i∣.​

At a zero-probability outcome, choose ωj=∣0⟩⟨0∣\omega_j=|0\rangle\langle0|ωj​=∣0⟩⟨0∣; its weighted contribution vanishes. Define χ′=S(∑jqjωj)−∑jqjS(ωj)\chi'=S(\sum_jq_j\omega_j)-\sum_jq_jS(\omega_j)χ′=S(∑j​qj​ωj​)−∑j​qj​S(ωj​), a=H(q)−χ′a=H(q)-\chi'a=H(q)−χ′, and b=1+S(ρB)−S(ρ)b=1+S(\rho_B)-S(\rho)b=1+S(ρB​)−S(ρ), with all entropies in bits and H(q)H(q)H(q) the classical label entropy. Then

(RA,RB)=(aa+b, S(ρB))is achievable.\left(R_A,R_B\right)=\left(\frac{a}{a+b},\ S(\rho_B)\right) \quad\text{is achievable}.(RA​,RB​)=(a+ba​, S(ρB​))is achievable.

An achievable pair uses independent blind local CPTP encoders, one noiseless quantum link from each sender, and a joint CPTP decoder, without supplied shared entanglement or side messages. For every δ,ϵ>0\delta,\epsilon>0δ,ϵ>0, every sufficiently large positive integer blocklength nnn admits positive compressed dimensions dA,dBd_A,d_BdA​,dB​ with log⁡2(dA)/n≤RA+δ\log_2(d_A)/n\le R_A+\deltalog2​(dA​)/n≤RA​+δ, log⁡2(dB)/n≤RB+δ\log_2(d_B)/n\le R_B+\deltalog2​(dB​)/n≤RB​+δ, and ensemble-average pure-input overlap with the reconstructed density operator at least 1−ϵ1-\epsilon1−ϵ. Draws are independent and identically distributed; this is squared fidelity, without a purifying reference.

The denominator satisfies a+b≥1a+b\ge1a+b≥1 for this family, so no additional nonzero-denominator hypothesis is needed. This hybrid coding rate is restricted to the displayed family and does not assert the false universal local-unitary normal form printed immediately before it.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P11
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P11

open MeasureTheory Filter

open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate Matrix

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P19 (both)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P27 (shannon)

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

/-- PDF pp.12–14, Section V.B, (37): the displayed-family hybrid rate is achievable
with Bob at S(E_B). The false universal normal-form claim is not a hypothesis.
No free classical side channel is supplied. -/
theorem hybrid_ratePair (p : Bool → ℝ) (hp : ∀ i, 0 ≤ p i)
    (htotal : ∑ i, p i = 1) (alpha beta : Bool → ℂ)
    (hcoeff : ∀ i, Complex.normSq (alpha i) + Complex.normSq (beta i) = 1) :
    FiniteAchievable p (hybridVector alpha beta) (hybridRateA p alpha beta)
      (vnEntropy (traceLeft (sourceMean p (hybridVector alpha beta)))) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P11

end
Source
On the distributed compression of quantum information, arXiv:quant-ph/0403042v3, PDF p. 13, Section V.B (37): hybrid achievable rate for the displayed family
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let p:{false,true}→Rp:\{\mathrm{false},\mathrm{true}\}\to\mathbb Rp:{false,true}→R satisfy pi≥0p_i\ge0pi​≥0 for each Boolean iii and ∑ipi=1\sum_i p_i=1∑i​pi​=1, and let arbitrary complex coefficient functions α,β\alpha,\betaα,β satisfy ∣αi∣2+∣βi∣2=1|\alpha_i|^2+|\beta_i|^2=1∣αi​∣2+∣βi​∣2=1 for each iii. Define vi=αi∣false,i⟩+βi∣true,¬i⟩v_i=\alpha_i|\mathrm{false},i\rangle+\beta_i|\mathrm{true},\neg i\ranglevi​=αi​∣false,i⟩+βi​∣true,¬i⟩ and ρ=∑ipi∣vi⟩⟨vi∣\rho=\sum_i p_i|v_i\rangle\langle v_i|ρ=∑i​pi​∣vi​⟩⟨vi​∣, with kets the coordinate vectors. Set wji=pi∣αi∣2w_{ji}=p_i|\alpha_i|^2wji​=pi​∣αi​∣2 for j=falsej=\mathrm{false}j=false and wji=pi∣βi∣2w_{ji}=p_i|\beta_i|^2wji​=pi​∣βi​∣2 for j=truej=\mathrm{true}j=true, let qj=∑iwjiq_j=\sum_iw_{ji}qj​=∑i​wji​, and define Cj=∣false⟩⟨false∣C_j=|\mathrm{false}\rangle\langle\mathrm{false}|Cj​=∣false⟩⟨false∣ if qj=0q_j=0qj​=0 and Cj=qj−1∑iwji∣j⊕i⟩⟨j⊕i∣C_j=q_j^{-1}\sum_iw_{ji}|j\mathbin{\oplus}i\rangle\langle j\mathbin{\oplus}i|Cj​=qj−1​∑i​wji​∣j⊕i⟩⟨j⊕i∣ otherwise. Write

S(X)=−Re⁡Tr⁡[cfc⁡(t↦tlog⁡2t)(X)],H(q)=−∑jqjlog⁡2qj,χ=S ⁣(∑jqjCj)−∑jqjS(Cj),B=1+S(ρB)−S(ρ),RA=H(q)−χH(q)−χ+B,RB=S(ρB),(ρB)b,b′=∑aρ(a,b),(a,b′).\begin{gathered} S(X)=-\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}[\operatorname{cfc}(t\mapsto t\log_2t)(X)], \quad H(q)=-\sum_jq_j\log_2q_j,\quad \chi=S\!\left(\sum_jq_jC_j\right)-\sum_jq_jS(C_j),\\ B=1+S(\rho_B)-S(\rho),\qquad R_A=\frac{H(q)-\chi}{H(q)-\chi+B},\qquad R_B=S(\rho_B), \quad (\rho_B)_{b,b'}=\sum_a\rho_{(a,b),(a,b')}. \end{gathered}S(X)=−ReTr[cfc(t↦tlog2​t)(X)],H(q)=−j∑​qj​log2​qj​,χ=S(j∑​qj​Cj​)−j∑​qj​S(Cj​),B=1+S(ρB​)−S(ρ),RA​=H(q)−χ+BH(q)−χ​,RB​=S(ρB​),(ρB​)b,b′​=a∑​ρ(a,b),(a,b′)​.​

Here continuous functional calculus defines SSS, logarithms use ln⁡0=0\ln0=0ln0=0, and a zero denominator in RAR_ARA​ gives RA=0R_A=0RA​=0. The theorem asserts that for every real δ>0\delta>0δ>0 and ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0, there is N∈NN\in\mathbb NN∈N such that for every integer n>Nn>Nn>N, there exist positive integers dA,dBd_A,d_BdA​,dB​, separate encoding channels EA,EB\mathcal E_A,\mathcal E_BEA​,EB​ from nnn Boolean coordinates to dimensions dA,dBd_A,d_BdA​,dB​, and a decoding channel D\mathcal DD back to the joint space, such that

log⁡2dAn≤RA+δ,log⁡2dBn≤RB+δ,∑w∈{false,true}n(∏t=0n−1pwt)Re⁡Tr⁡ ⁣[Pw D((EA⊗EB)(Pw))]≥1−ε,\frac{\log_2d_A}{n}\le R_A+\delta,\qquad \frac{\log_2d_B}{n}\le R_B+\delta,\qquad \sum_{w\in\{\mathrm{false},\mathrm{true}\}^n} \left(\prod_{t=0}^{n-1}p_{w_t}\right) \operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}\!\left[ P_w\,\mathcal D\bigl((\mathcal E_A\otimes\mathcal E_B)(P_w)\bigr) \right]\ge1-\varepsilon,nlog2​dA​​≤RA​+δ,nlog2​dB​​≤RB​+δ,w∈{false,true}n∑​(t=0∏n−1​pwt​​)ReTr[Pw​D((EA​⊗EB​)(Pw​))]≥1−ε,

where Pw=∣Vw⟩⟨Vw∣P_w=|V_w\rangle\langle V_w|Pw​=∣Vw​⟩⟨Vw​∣ and Vw(x,y)=∏t=0n−1vwt(xt,yt)V_w(x,y)=\prod_{t=0}^{n-1}v_{w_t}(x_t,y_t)Vw​(x,y)=∏t=0n−1​vwt​​(xt​,yt​). Each channel is required to have a finite Kraus representation X↦∑jKjXKj†X\mapsto\sum_jK_jXK_j^\daggerX↦∑j​Kj​XKj†​ with ∑jKj†Kj=I\sum_jK_j^\dagger K_j=I∑j​Kj†​Kj​=I. The hypotheses allow zero label probabilities and zero individual coefficients.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me