Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

CG-covers on locally compact Hausdorff spaces admit open refinements

Proved
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P32.cgCover_hasOpenRefinement

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let XXX be a locally compact Hausdorff space, regarded in CGH\mathrm{CGH}CGH, and let (Va↪X)a∈A(V_a\hookrightarrow X)_{a\in A}(Va​↪X)a∈A​ be a CG\mathcal{CG}CG-cover. There is an open cover refining this family. Equivalently, its canonical interior refinement covers:

X=⋃a∈Aint⁡X(Va).X=\bigcup_{a\in A}\operatorname{int}_{X}(V_a).X=a∈A⋃​intX​(Va​).

The refinement runs from open subsets into the given members VaV_aVa​. This identifies the covering behavior of the two topologies on locally compact Hausdorff spaces.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P32
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P32

universe u

open Set Topology

/-- Proposition 3.3, PDF p.18: every CG-cover of a locally compact Hausdorff
space admits an open refinement. The interiors give a canonical such refinement. -/
theorem cgCover_hasOpenRefinement (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X]
    [T2Space X] [CompactlyGeneratedSpace X] [LocallyCompactSpace X]
    {A : Type u} (V : A → Set X) (hV : CGCover V) :
    HasOpenRefinement V := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P32
Source
Compactly Generated Stacks: A Cartesian Closed Theory of Topological Stacks, arXiv:0907.3925v3, PDF p. 18, Proposition 3.3
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every Hausdorff, compactly generated, locally compact topological space XXX, every index type AAA in the same universe, and every family (Va)a∈A(V_a)_{a\in A}(Va​)a∈A​ of subsets of XXX, suppose that for each compact subset K⊆XK\subseteq XK⊆X there exists a finite subset J⊆AJ\subseteq AJ⊆A such that

K=⋃a∈Jint⁡K(K∩Va),K=\bigcup_{a\in J}\operatorname{int}_K(K\cap V_a),K=a∈J⋃​intK​(K∩Va​),

with interiors taken in the subspace KKK. Then

X=⋃a∈Aint⁡X(Va).X=\bigcup_{a\in A}\operatorname{int}_X(V_a).X=a∈A⋃​intX​(Va​).

In particular, every point of XXX lies in the interior in XXX of some original family member; the members VaV_aVa​ themselves are not assumed open. Empty spaces and empty family members are allowed. The hypothesis for K=∅K=\varnothingK=∅ permits J=∅J=\varnothingJ=∅, and if X=∅X=\varnothingX=∅, the conclusion has no points to check.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me