The winding interval is invariant under reparametrization of
ProvedHryniewiczCriterion.windingInterval_reparamhamiltonian-dynamicssymplectic-geometry
Let be any matrix path, and let be continuous with , and on . Then the winding interval of Hryniewicz §2.1.1 does not change under reparametrization: .
Proof idea: an angle lift of gives the angle lift of , with the same endpoint values. Applying this to gives the reverse inclusion.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_HryniewiczCriterion_GraphAngle open HryniewiczCriterion open scoped ContDiff
Formal statement
theorem HryniewiczCriterion.windingInterval_reparam (φ : ℝ → Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ) (ψ χ : ℝ → ℝ)
(hψc : ContinuousOn ψ (Set.Icc 0 1)) (hψm : Set.MapsTo ψ (Set.Icc 0 1) (Set.Icc 0 1))
(hψ0 : ψ 0 = 0) (hψ1 : ψ 1 = 1)
(hχc : ContinuousOn χ (Set.Icc 0 1)) (hχm : Set.MapsTo χ (Set.Icc 0 1) (Set.Icc 0 1))
(hχ0 : χ 0 = 0) (hχ1 : χ 1 = 1) (hψχ : ∀ t ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ψ (χ t) = t) :
windingInterval (fun t => φ (ψ t)) = windingInterval φ := by sorrySource
Hryniewicz, https://arxiv.org/html/1105.2077v5, Section 2.1.1, equations (4)–(5) (definition of the winding interval I(φ)); invariance under orientation-preserving reparametrization, used for time changes of periodic orbits as in Hofer–Wysocki–Zehnder, The dynamics on three-dimensional strictly convex energy surfaces, Ann. of Math. 148 (1998), https://doi.org/10.2307/120994, (3.31)–(3.32), p. 219.