Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Local W1,pW^{1,p}W1,p solutions of real-linear Cauchy–Riemann equations with prescribed value

Proved
JHolomorphic.exists_local_weak_solution

by Mazecto · Oct 20, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

elliptic-regularitypseudoholomorphic-curvessobolev-spacessymplectic-geometryunique-continuation

Let 2<p<∞2<p<\infty2<p<∞, let D⊂CD\subset\mathbb{C}D⊂C be the open unit disc and let A∈Lp(D,End⁡R(Cn))A\in L^p(D,\operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{R}}(\mathbb{C}^n))A∈Lp(D,EndR​(Cn)). For every u0∈Cnu_0\in\mathbb{C}^nu0​∈Cn and every sufficiently small ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0 there is a continuous u∈W1,p(Dε,Cn)u\in W^{1,p}(D_\varepsilon,\mathbb{C}^n)u∈W1,p(Dε​,Cn) with u(0)=u0u(0)=u_0u(0)=u0​ and

∂su+i ∂tu+Au=0almost everywhere on Dε,\partial_su+i\,\partial_tu+Au=0\quad\text{almost everywhere on }D_\varepsilon,∂s​u+i∂t​u+Au=0almost everywhere on Dε​,

where DεD_\varepsilonDε​ is the open disc of radius ε\varepsilonε and ∂su\partial_su∂s​u, ∂tu\partial_tu∂t​u are weak partial derivatives.

Formalization Note Cn\mathbb{C}^nCn is EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin n) and AAA has type ℂ → EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin n) →L[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin n) with MemLp A (ENNReal.ofReal p) (volume.restrict (ball 0 1)). "Every sufficiently small ε\varepsilonε" is ∀ᶠ ε in 𝓝[>] 0. The weak partials are given by HasWeakPartialsOn (ball 0 ε) u us ut, and u,us,ut∈Lp(Dε)u,u_s,u_t\in L^p(D_\varepsilon)u,us​,ut​∈Lp(Dε​).

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_JHolomorphic_Setting
Formal statement
namespace JHolomorphic

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology DbarRegularity
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal NNReal

/-- Wendl, Lemma 2.24 (p. 39): let `2 < p < ∞` and `A ∈ L^p(D, End_ℝ(ℂⁿ))` on the open unit disc
`D`. For every `u₀ ∈ ℂⁿ` and every sufficiently small `ε > 0` there is a continuous
`u ∈ W^{1,p}(D_ε)` with `u(0) = u₀` that solves `∂̄u + A u = 0` weakly on `D_ε`. -/
theorem exists_local_weak_solution (n : ℕ) (p : ℝ) (hp : 2 < p)
    (A : ℂ → EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin n) →L[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin n))
    (hA : MemLp A (ENNReal.ofReal p) (volume.restrict (ball 0 1)))
    (u₀ : EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin n)) :
    ∀ᶠ ε in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ), ∃ u : ℂ → EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin n), ContinuousOn u (ball 0 ε) ∧
      u 0 = u₀ ∧ ∃ us ut : ℂ → EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin n), HasWeakPartialsOn (ball 0 ε) u us ut ∧
        MemLp u (ENNReal.ofReal p) (volume.restrict (ball 0 ε)) ∧
        MemLp us (ENNReal.ofReal p) (volume.restrict (ball 0 ε)) ∧
        MemLp ut (ENNReal.ofReal p) (volume.restrict (ball 0 ε)) ∧
        ∀ᵐ z ∂(volume.restrict (ball 0 ε)), us z + Complex.I • ut z + A z (u z) = 0 := by
  sorry

end JHolomorphic
Source
C. Wendl, Lectures on Symplectic Field Theory, arXiv:1612.01009, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01009, Lecture 2, Lemma 2.24, p. 39
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

JHolomorphic.exists_local_weak_solution

Data and hypotheses. Let n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}n∈N (including n=0n = 0n=0, in which case C0={0}\mathbb{C}^0 = \{0\}C0={0} and every statement below about Cn\mathbb{C}^nCn-valued maps is trivially satisfiable). Write Cn\mathbb{C}^nCn for the Euclidean (Hermitian) space Cn\mathbb{C}^nCn with its standard norm, its complex scalar multiplication, and its underlying real vector space structure. Let p∈Rp \in \mathbb{R}p∈R with

p>2.p > 2 .p>2.

Let

A:C→LR(Cn,Cn)A : \mathbb{C} \to \mathcal{L}_{\mathbb{R}}(\mathbb{C}^n, \mathbb{C}^n)A:C→LR​(Cn,Cn)

be any map assigning to each z∈Cz \in \mathbb{C}z∈C a continuous real-linear operator A(z)A(z)A(z) on Cn\mathbb{C}^nCn (no complex linearity, continuity or smoothness in zzz is assumed). The only hypothesis on AAA is that it lies in LpL^pLp on the open unit disc D1={z∈C:∣z∣<1}D_1 = \{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z| < 1\}D1​={z∈C:∣z∣<1} with respect to Lebesgue measure, using the operator norm on LR(Cn,Cn)\mathcal{L}_{\mathbb{R}}(\mathbb{C}^n,\mathbb{C}^n)LR​(Cn,Cn): that is, AAA is almost-everywhere strongly measurable on D1D_1D1​ and

∫D1∥A(z)∥opp dz<∞.\int_{D_1} \|A(z)\|_{\mathrm{op}}^p \, dz < \infty .∫D1​​∥A(z)∥opp​dz<∞.

Nothing is assumed about AAA outside D1D_1D1​. Finally, let u0∈Cnu_0 \in \mathbb{C}^nu0​∈Cn be an arbitrary vector.

Conclusion. For all sufficiently small ε>0\varepsilon > 0ε>0 — precisely: there exists δ>0\delta > 0δ>0 such that for every ε\varepsilonε with 0<ε<δ0 < \varepsilon < \delta0<ε<δ — the following holds, with Dε={z∈C:∣z∣<ε}D_\varepsilon = \{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z| < \varepsilon\}Dε​={z∈C:∣z∣<ε} the open disc of radius ε\varepsilonε about 000 and all measures being Lebesgue measure on C≅R2\mathbb{C} \cong \mathbb{R}^2C≅R2. There exist maps u,us,ut:C→Cnu, u_s, u_t : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}^nu,us​,ut​:C→Cn (which may depend on ε\varepsilonε; their values outside DεD_\varepsilonDε​ are unconstrained) such that:

  1. uuu is continuous on DεD_\varepsilonDε​ (as a map restricted to DεD_\varepsilonDε​);
  2. u(0)=u0u(0) = u_0u(0)=u0​;
  3. usu_sus​ and utu_tut​ are weak partial derivatives of uuu on DεD_\varepsilonDε​ in the following sense: for every real-valued test function φ:C→R\varphi : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}φ:C→R that is C∞C^\inftyC∞ (as a function of two real variables), has compact support, and whose closed support {φ≠0}‾\overline{\{\varphi \ne 0\}}{φ=0}​ is contained in the open disc DεD_\varepsilonDε​, both identities
∫C∂sφ(z) u(z) dz=−∫Cφ(z) us(z) dz,∫C∂tφ(z) u(z) dz=−∫Cφ(z) ut(z) dz\int_{\mathbb{C}} \partial_s \varphi(z)\, u(z)\, dz = -\int_{\mathbb{C}} \varphi(z)\, u_s(z)\, dz, \qquad \int_{\mathbb{C}} \partial_t \varphi(z)\, u(z)\, dz = -\int_{\mathbb{C}} \varphi(z)\, u_t(z)\, dz∫C​∂s​φ(z)u(z)dz=−∫C​φ(z)us​(z)dz,∫C​∂t​φ(z)u(z)dz=−∫C​φ(z)ut​(z)dz

hold, where z=s+itz = s + i tz=s+it, ∂sφ(z)\partial_s \varphi(z)∂s​φ(z) is the real Fréchet derivative of φ\varphiφ at zzz applied to the vector 111, and ∂tφ(z)\partial_t \varphi(z)∂t​φ(z) is that derivative applied to the vector iii. The integrals are Bochner integrals of Cn\mathbb{C}^nCn-valued functions over all of C\mathbb{C}C, with the convention that the integral of a non-integrable function is defined to be 000 (so each identity is an equation between these conventional values); 4. uuu, usu_sus​ and utu_tut​ each lie in Lp(Dε)L^p(D_\varepsilon)Lp(Dε​): each is almost-everywhere strongly measurable on DεD_\varepsilonDε​ and has finite integral of the ppp-th power of its norm over DεD_\varepsilonDε​; 5. for Lebesgue-almost every z∈Dεz \in D_\varepsilonz∈Dε​,

us(z)+i⋅ut(z)+A(z)(u(z))=0,u_s(z) + i \cdot u_t(z) + A(z)\big(u(z)\big) = 0,us​(z)+i⋅ut​(z)+A(z)(u(z))=0,

where i⋅ut(z)i \cdot u_t(z)i⋅ut​(z) is complex scalar multiplication by iii in Cn\mathbb{C}^nCn and A(z)(u(z))A(z)(u(z))A(z)(u(z)) is the real-linear operator A(z)A(z)A(z) applied to the vector u(z)u(z)u(z).

The exponent ppp enters only through the LpL^pLp conditions (the hypothesis on AAA over D1D_1D1​ and conclusion 4 over DεD_\varepsilonDε​); no Sobolev space, regularity beyond continuity, or uniqueness of uuu is asserted, and no relation between δ\deltaδ and AAA, u0u_0u0​, nnn or ppp is stated.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me