Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 10.3.1 — the house selling problem's explicit threshold

Proved
MDPFinance.OptimalStopping.theorem_10_3_1

by Shuze Chen · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

dynamic-programmingmathematical-financeoperations-researchoptimal-stoppingoptimizationprobability

Theorem 10.3.1 (p. 317). In the unbounded horizon house selling problem it is optimal to accept the first offer which exceeds the threshold x∗x^*x∗, where x∗x^*x∗ is the maximum point of the function

x↦−c Q([m,x))+∫x∞x′Q(dx′)1−βQ([m,x))x \mapsto \frac{-c\,Q([m,x)) + \int_x^\infty x'Q(dx')}{1 - \beta Q([m,x))}x↦1−βQ([m,x))−cQ([m,x))+∫x∞​x′Q(dx′)​

on the interval E=[m,M]E = [m,M]E=[m,M] and x∗<Mx^* < Mx∗<M.

The first fully explicit answer in the chapter: not just "a threshold exists" but a one-dimensional maximisation that produces it. The numerator is the expected reward of one round of the threshold policy — pay −c-c−c on each rejection, collect the offer on acceptance — and the denominator discounts the geometric number of rounds.

x∗<Mx^* < Mx∗<M is a genuine part of the statement, not a boundary remark: it says the seller does not hold out for the maximum possible offer, which is what makes the policy stop almost surely and hence optimal at all, since Corollary 10.2.6 a) is applied to it precisely through Px(τ∗<∞)=1\mathbb{P}_x(\tau^* < \infty) = 1Px​(τ∗<∞)=1.

This is the unbounded-horizon version, so β∈(0,1)\beta \in (0,1)β∈(0,1) strictly.

Moderation note. The draft assumed Assumption (B) as a hypothesis although the book derives it (β < 1, bounded rewards); dropped. The threshold rule's stopping time is stated to be a stopping time, a.s. finite on E, and to attain V_∞^* on E.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_MDPFinance_OptimalStopping_Applications

open MeasureTheory Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace MDPFinance.OptimalStopping

/-- **Theorem 10.3.1** (p. 317). In the unbounded-horizon house selling problem it is optimal to
accept the first offer exceeding the threshold `x^*`, a maximum point on `[m,M]` of
`x ↦ (-c Q([m,x)) + ∫_x^∞ x' Q(dx')) / (1 − β Q([m,x)))`, and `x^* < M`. -/
theorem theorem_10_3_1 (H : HouseSelling) (Pr : ℝ → Measure (ℕ → ℝ))
    (hPr : H.toProblem.IsPathLaw Pr) :
    ∃ xstar ∈ H.E,
      IsGreatest (H.thresholdObjective '' H.E) (H.thresholdObjective xstar) ∧
      xstar < H.M ∧
      IsStopTime (hitTime {y : ℝ | xstar ≤ y}) ∧
      (∀ x ∈ H.E, Pr x {w | hitTime {y : ℝ | xstar ≤ y} w = ⊤} = 0) ∧
      ∀ x ∈ H.E, H.toProblem.EReward Pr (hitTime {y : ℝ | xstar ≤ y}) x =
        H.toProblem.Vstar Pr x := by sorry

end MDPFinance.OptimalStopping
Source
Bäuerle and Rieder, Markov Decision Processes with Applications to Finance, Universitext, Springer 2011, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-18324-9, p. 317 (PDF 325), Theorem 10.3.1
Human review
  • Endorsed by Community (Bot) · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me