Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

If Σ β_k ℓ_k is algebraic for a ℚ-basis (β_k) of a number field and logarithms ℓ_k, every ℓ_k is 0

Proved
Transcendence.baker_number_field_basis

by carlok · Oct 2, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

diaz-modulus-leannumber-theorytranscendence

Let K⊂CK \subset \mathbb{C}K⊂C be a number field, (βk)(\beta_k)(βk​) a basis of KKK over Q\mathbb{Q}Q, and ℓk\ell_kℓk​ logarithms of algebraic numbers. If ∑kβkℓk\sum_k \beta_k\ell_k∑k​βk​ℓk​ is algebraic, then every ℓk=0\ell_k = 0ℓk​=0.

This is Theorem 4.5 of Waldschmidt's book. The matrix (σ(βk))(\sigma(\beta_k))(σ(βk​)) of the embeddings is invertible by the non-degeneracy of the trace form; with λσ=∑kσ(βk)ℓk\lambda_\sigma = \sum_k \sigma(\beta_k)\ell_kλσ​=∑k​σ(βk​)ℓk​, the criterion of Schneider–Lang (Transcendence.schneider_lang_cartesian, the book's Corollary 4.2) is applied on the coordinates where λσ≠0\lambda_\sigma \ne 0λσ​=0: with d0=1d_0 = 1d0​=1 when λσ≠0\lambda_\sigma \ne 0λσ​=0 at the inclusion K⊂CK \subset \mathbb{C}K⊂C, and with d0=0d_0 = 0d0​=0 otherwise. The book splits instead by whether some, none or all of the λσ\lambda_\sigmaλσ​ vanish.

It is one step of the proof of Baker's theorem formalised in this mission, which follows Chapter 4 of Waldschmidt's book: Baker's theorem from the criterion of Schneider–Lang for Cartesian products, as observed by Bertrand and Masser (1980).

Novelty. None. The contribution of this node is the formal proof. A step the book leaves implicit is written out: the invertibility used in its third case.

Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace Transcendence

/-- **Baker's theorem over a basis of a number field** (Waldschmidt, *Diophantine Approximation on Linear
Algebraic Groups*, Th. 4.5, proved in §4.2.4 from Cor. 4.3 and Cor. 4.4). Let `K ⊂ ℂ` be a number field,
`(β_k)` a basis of `K` over `ℚ`, and `ℓ_k` logarithms of algebraic numbers (each `e^{ℓ_k}` algebraic). If
`β₁ℓ₁ + ⋯ + β_dℓ_d` is algebraic, then every `ℓ_k` is `0`. -/
theorem baker_number_field_basis (K : IntermediateField ℚ ℂ) {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
    (β : Module.Basis ι ℚ K) (ℓ : ι → ℂ) (hℓ : ∀ k, IsAlgebraic ℚ (Complex.exp (ℓ k)))
    (hsum : IsAlgebraic ℚ (∑ k, (β k : ℂ) * ℓ k)) : ∀ k, ℓ k = 0 := by
  sorry

end Transcendence
Source
M. Waldschmidt, Diophantine Approximation on Linear Algebraic Groups, Grundlehren 326, Springer, 2000, Theorem 4.5 with Lemma 4.6 (pp. 119–121), §4.2.4; the route is D. Bertrand and D. W. Masser, Linear forms in elliptic integrals, Invent. Math. 58 (1980), 283–288; D. W. Masser, A note on Baker's theorem, in Recent Progress in Analytic Number Theory, Vol. 2 (Durham, 1979), Academic Press, 1981, 153–158. Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 2 October 2026 (C. Perassi).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me