Expected Shortfall is subadditive
ProvedCoherentRisk.es_subadditiveoperations-researchprobability
Expected Shortfall satisfies the subadditivity axiom: merging two positions never requires more capital than holding them separately. This is precisely the axiom that Value-at-Risk violates, and it is the reason Expected Shortfall replaced it in the Basel market-risk framework. It follows from subadditivity of the worst total by dividing through by the positive constant .
As throughout CoherentRisk, the development counts states and refers to no probability measure, so no confidence level is attached to .
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_ExpectedShortfall open CoherentRisk
Formal statement
namespace CoherentRisk
theorem es_subadditive {n : ℕ} (m : Fin (n+1)) :
Subadditive (fun X : Fin (n+1) → ℝ => ES X m) := by
sorry
end CoherentRiskSource
C. Acerbi and D. Tasche, On the coherence of expected shortfall, Journal of Banking and Finance 26 (2002) 1487-1503, Section 3; P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber and D. Heath, Coherent Measures of Risk, Mathematical Finance 9 (1999) 203-228, Definition 2.4