Winding numbers versus the polar rotation angle of a path in
ProvedHryniewiczCriterion.windingInterval_polar_angle_boundsdynamical-systemssymplectic-geometry
Let have a continuous polar angle : and with symmetric positive definite. Suppose with . Then every element of the winding interval (total rotation, in turns, of a vector under ) satisfies
The first bound holds because the angle between and stays in . The second comes from the sharp bound on that angle when .
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_HryniewiczCriterion_GraphAngle open HryniewiczCriterion open scoped ContDiff
Formal statement
theorem HryniewiczCriterion.windingInterval_polar_angle_bounds {φ : ℝ → Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ} {α : ℝ → ℝ}
(hα : IsPolarAngleLift φ α) {P : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ} (hP : P.PosDef)
(hdet : P.det = 1) (hφ1 : φ 1 = rotationMatrix (α 1) * P) :
∀ d ∈ windingInterval φ,
α 1 - Real.arccos (2 / (P 0 0 + P 1 1)) ≤ 2 * Real.pi * d ∧
|2 * Real.pi * d - α 1| < Real.pi / 2 := by sorrySource
Hryniewicz, https://arxiv.org/html/1105.2077v5, Section 2.1.1, winding interval (4); polar decomposition estimate used in Hofer–Wysocki–Zehnder, The dynamics on three-dimensional strictly convex energy surfaces, Ann. of Math. 148 (1998), https://doi.org/10.2307/120994, (3.45)–(3.46), p. 222. Elementary comparison lemma; not a verbatim numbered assertion.