lean_workbook_plus_6882
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
The inequality is equivalent to:\n\n
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_6882 : ∀ q : ℝ, q ≠ 0 ∧ q ≠ 1 ∧ 2 * (2 - 3 * q) / (q * (1 - q)) + 4 * q * Real.sqrt 2 / (1 - 2 * q) - 9 - 4 * Real.sqrt 2 ≥ 0 := by sorry
The formalization universally asserts q≠0 and q≠1 rather than assuming them.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Move domain conditions into hypotheses and also exclude q=1/2; recover the original admissible range before asserting the inequality.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_6882 : ∀ q : ℝ, q ≠ 0 ∧ q ≠ 1 ∧ 2 * (2 - 3 * q) / (q * (1 - q)) + 4 * q * Real.sqrt 2 / (1 - 2 * q) - 9 - 4 * Real.sqrt 2 ≥ 0 := by sorry