Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Stieltjes densities: nonzero L2, radial asymptotics, and polynomials

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92.stieltjes_basic

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let d≥1d\geq1d≥1 and let ρ≠0\rho\neq0ρ=0 be a positive Borel measure on [0,∞)[0,\infty)[0,∞). Define the extended nonnegative density Θ(x)=∫0∞(y2+∥x∥2)−1 dρ(y)\Theta(x)=\int_0^\infty(y^2+\|x\|^2)^{-1}\,d\rho(y)Θ(x)=∫0∞​(y2+∥x∥2)−1dρ(y) and ν=Θ dx\nu=\Theta\,dxν=Θdx on Rd\mathbb R^dRd. The following are equivalent: Θ(x)<∞\Theta(x)<\inftyΘ(x)<∞ for some nonzero xxx; it is finite at every nonzero xxx; L2(ν)≠{0}L^2(\nu)\neq\{0\}L2(ν)={0}; and ∫0∞(1+y2)−1 dρ(y)<∞\int_0^\infty(1+y^2)^{-1}\,d\rho(y)<\infty∫0∞​(1+y2)−1dρ(y)<∞. Under these conditions, ρ\rhoρ is tempered and

lim⁡∥x∥→∞Θ(x)∥x∥2=ρ([0,∞))>0.\lim_{\|x\|\to\infty}\Theta(x)\|x\|^2=\rho([0,\infty))>0.∥x∥→∞lim​Θ(x)∥x∥2=ρ([0,∞))>0.

The limit is allowed to be infinite. There is a nonzero polynomial in L2(ν)L^2(\nu)L2(ν) exactly when d=1d=1d=1 and ν\nuν is finite; every polynomial in L2(ν)L^2(\nu)L2(ν) is constant. In dimension one,

ν(R)=π∫0∞y−1 dρ(y).\nu(\mathbb R)=\pi\int_0^\infty y^{-1}\,d\rho(y).ν(R)=π∫0∞​y−1dρ(y).

All reciprocals and integrals here are extended nonnegative quantities, so the reciprocal at zero is infinite.

This result identifies the nontrivial and polynomial parts of the Stieltjes-measure Hilbert model.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P92
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92

open scoped ComplexConjugate BigOperators NNReal ENNReal

open MeasureTheory

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

universe u v

variable (E : Type u) [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]

variable {E}

/-- Lemma A.1, PDF pp. 42--43, all equivalences and both additional clauses.
The radial limit and reciprocal at y=0 are extended nonnegative values.
The final total-mass identity is asserted only in dimension one. -/
theorem stieltjes_basic (d : ℕ) (hd : 0 < d) (rho : Measure ℝ≥0) (hRho : rho ≠ 0) :
    ((∃ x : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d), x ≠ 0 ∧ stieltjesDensity d rho x < ⊤) ↔
      ∀ x : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d), x ≠ 0 → stieltjesDensity d rho x < ⊤) ∧
    ((∀ x : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d), x ≠ 0 → stieltjesDensity d rho x < ⊤) ↔
      Nontrivial (Lp ℂ 2 (stieltjesMeasure d rho))) ∧
    (Nontrivial (Lp ℂ 2 (stieltjesMeasure d rho)) ↔ IsTame rho) ∧
    (IsTame rho →
      IsTemperedMeasure (Measure.map (fun y : ℝ≥0 => (y : ℝ)) rho) ∧
      0 < rho Set.univ ∧
      Filter.Tendsto
        (fun x : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) =>
          stieltjesDensity d rho x * ENNReal.ofReal (‖x‖ ^ 2))
        (Filter.comap (fun x : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) => ‖x‖) Filter.atTop)
        (nhds (rho Set.univ)) ∧
      ((∃ p : MvPolynomial (Fin d) ℂ, p ≠ 0 ∧
          MemLp (polynomialValue p) 2 (stieltjesMeasure d rho)) ↔
        d = 1 ∧ stieltjesMeasure d rho Set.univ < ⊤) ∧
      (∀ p : MvPolynomial (Fin d) ℂ,
        MemLp (polynomialValue p) 2 (stieltjesMeasure d rho) →
          ∃ c : ℂ, p = MvPolynomial.C c) ∧
      (d = 1 → stieltjesMeasure d rho Set.univ =
        ENNReal.ofReal Real.pi * (∫⁻ y, (y : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ∂rho))) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92

end
Source
Reflection positive one-parameter groups and dilations, arXiv:1312.6161v2, PDF p. 42, Lemma A.1
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let ddd be a natural number with d>0d>0d>0, and let ρ\rhoρ be a nonzero measure on [0,∞)[0,\infty)[0,∞). Define

f(x)=∫[0,∞)(y2+∥x∥2)−1 dρ(y),μ(A)=∫Af(x) dxf(x)=\int_{[0,\infty)}(y^2+\|x\|^2)^{-1}\,d\rho(y), \qquad \mu(A)=\int_A f(x)\,dxf(x)=∫[0,∞)​(y2+∥x∥2)−1dρ(y),μ(A)=∫A​f(x)dx

for measurable subsets AAA of real Euclidean ddd-space, using extended nonnegative integrals and 0−1=+∞0^{-1}=+\infty0−1=+∞. Then there exists a nonzero xxx with f(x)<+∞f(x)<+\inftyf(x)<+∞ if and only if every nonzero xxx satisfies f(x)<+∞f(x)<+\inftyf(x)<+∞; every nonzero xxx satisfies this finiteness condition if and only if the complex space L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ), whose elements are square-integrable functions modulo almost-everywhere equality, has at least two distinct elements; and L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) has at least two distinct elements if and only if

∫[0,∞)(1+y2)−1 dρ(y)<+∞.\int_{[0,\infty)}(1+y^2)^{-1}\,d\rho(y)<+\infty.∫[0,∞)​(1+y2)−1dρ(y)<+∞.

If this last integral is finite, all of the following also hold: the pushforward ν\nuν of ρ\rhoρ under the inclusion [0,∞)↪R[0,\infty)\hookrightarrow\mathbb R[0,∞)↪R satisfies

∃N∈N,∫R(1+∣z∣2)−N dν(z)<+∞;\exists N\in\mathbb N,\qquad \int_{\mathbb R}(1+|z|^2)^{-N}\,d\nu(z)<+\infty;∃N∈N,∫R​(1+∣z∣2)−Ndν(z)<+∞;

the total mass obeys 0<ρ([0,∞))0<\rho([0,\infty))0<ρ([0,∞)); and, as ∥x∥\|x\|∥x∥ tends to +∞+\infty+∞,

f(x) ∥x∥2⟶ρ([0,∞))f(x)\,\|x\|^2\longrightarrow\rho([0,\infty))f(x)∥x∥2⟶ρ([0,∞))

in the topology of the extended nonnegative reals, so the limit is allowed to be +∞+\infty+∞. Under the same finiteness assumption, there exists a nonzero complex polynomial ppp in ddd variables whose evaluation on real Euclidean ddd-space belongs to L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) if and only if d=1d=1d=1 and μ\muμ has finite total mass; every polynomial whose evaluation belongs to L2(μ)L^2(\mu)L2(μ) is equal, as a polynomial, to a constant polynomial ccc for some c∈Cc\in\mathbb Cc∈C; and, if d=1d=1d=1, then

μ(Rd)=π∫[0,∞)y−1 dρ(y).\mu(\mathbb R^d) =\pi\int_{[0,\infty)}y^{-1}\,d\rho(y).μ(Rd)=π∫[0,∞)​y−1dρ(y).

Here polynomial evaluation embeds each real coordinate into C\mathbb CC, and membership in L2L^2L2 means almost-everywhere strong measurability together with finiteness of the integral of the squared absolute value. The integer NNN may be zero, the total masses in the assertions need not be finite unless explicitly stated, and all displayed inverses, products, and nonnegative integrals use extended nonnegative arithmetic, including 0⋅(+∞)=00\cdot(+\infty)=00⋅(+∞)=0. The assumptions exclude d=0d=0d=0 and ρ=0\rho=0ρ=0.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me