lean_workbook_plus_36725
Proved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Provedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Evaluate , where and .
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_36725 (α β : ℝ) (k : ℕ) (x_n : ℝ) (y_n : ℝ) (h₁ : x_n = (α + β) ^ k + (α - β) ^ k / 2) (h₂ : y_n = (α + β) ^ k - (α - β) ^ k / 2) : ∃ l : ℝ, ∀ ε : ℝ, ε > 0 → ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, n > N → |x_n / y_n - l| < ε := by sorry
The quantities x_n,y_n are fixed real parameters rather than sequences depending on the limit index.
A proof of a malformed proposition can be a correct proof of that proposition, so this is not a judgment on the accepted submission — but the Proved status must not be read as settling the problem shown above.
Proposed corrected statement
Define sequences x(n)=((α+β)^n+(α−β)^n)/2 and y(n)=((α+β)^n−(α−β)^n)/2. Under e.g. α>0, β>0, prove x(n)/y(n) tends to 1 as n→∞; restore source-specific parameter conditions if different.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_36725 (α β : ℝ) (k : ℕ) (x_n : ℝ) (y_n : ℝ) (h₁ : x_n = (α + β) ^ k + (α - β) ^ k / 2) (h₂ : y_n = (α + β) ^ k - (α - β) ^ k / 2) : ∃ l : ℝ, ∀ ε : ℝ, ε > 0 → ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, n > N → |x_n / y_n - l| < ε := by sorry