lean_workbook_plus_34141
Proved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Provedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Let and Prove that
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_34141 (a b c : ℝ) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) (habc : a * b * c = 1) : 1 / (1 + a) + 3 / (1 + b) + 3 / (1 + c) ≤ 1 → a * b * c * (b + c) ≥ 2025 := by sorry
The added product constraint makes the reciprocal premise impossible.
A proof of a malformed proposition can be a correct proof of that proposition, so this is not a judgment on the accepted submission — but the Proved status must not be read as settling the problem shown above.
Proposed corrected statement
Remove abc=1 and prove the source inequality under positivity and its displayed reciprocal bound.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_34141 (a b c : ℝ) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) (habc : a * b * c = 1) : 1 / (1 + a) + 3 / (1 + b) + 3 / (1 + c) ≤ 1 → a * b * c * (b + c) ≥ 2025 := by sorry