Two distinct candidates whose difference is real or purely imaginary: a rational ratio of squared moduli, equal moduli, and v = ±ū are equivalent
ProvedDiazModulus.candidate_axis_ratioLet be candidates for Diaz's conjecture with real or purely imaginary. The following are equivalent: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) if is purely imaginary, and if is real.
This is the equivalence in Theorem 2.3 of C. Perassi's unpublished manuscript on Diaz's modulus conjecture; its last assertion is Diaz.axis_triple_indep. It concerns candidates, so it is vacuous if Diaz's conjecture holds.
Proof. (ii) and (iii) are equivalent by plane geometry: equal real parts and equal moduli force opposite imaginary parts, and equal imaginary parts and equal moduli force opposite real parts. (ii) gives (i) with ratio . For (i) ⇒ (ii), the condition on gives or . With and , it says that satisfies a quadratic equation over , so and are algebraically dependent. By DiazModulus.candidate_pair_dichotomy, or with . Candidates lie on neither axis (Hermite–Lindemann), so forces , which is excluded, and forces , hence .
Novelty. Not asserted. The step (i) ⇒ (ii) is Waldschmidt's Corollary 4 (1973, p. 192) at ; the rest is elementary.
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
open Complex ComplexConjugate
namespace DiazModulus
theorem candidate_axis_ratio (u v : ℂ) (hu : IsCandidate u) (hv : IsCandidate v)
(huv : u ≠ v) (hτ : (v - u).im = 0 ∨ (v - u).re = 0) :
((∃ m : ℚ, v * conj v = (m : ℂ) * (u * conj u)) ↔ ‖v‖ = ‖u‖) ∧
(‖v‖ = ‖u‖ ↔ (((v - u).re = 0 → v = conj u) ∧ ((v - u).im = 0 → v = -conj u))) := by
sorry
end DiazModulus