Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Polynomial-size commutative aggregates cannot be half of a covering pair (Erdős 624)

Proved
Erdos624.monoid_factor_common_hole_eventually

by Ethan Cheung · Oct 24, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

combinatoricserdos-problems

Theorem. Fix a≥0a\ge0a≥0. There is k0k_0k0​ such that for all k≥k0k\ge k_0k≥k0​ the following holds. Let ∣U∣=n=2k|U|=n=2^k∣U∣=n=2k, let MMM be any finite commutative monoid with ∣M∣≤na|M|\le n^a∣M∣≤na, and let v:U→Mv:U\to Mv:U→M, ψ:M→U\psi:M\to Uψ:M→U, g:P(U)→Ug:\mathcal P(U)\to Ug:P(U)→U be arbitrary. Put h(A)=ψ(∏x∈Av(x))h(A)=\psi\bigl(\prod_{x\in A}v(x)\bigr)h(A)=ψ(∏x∈A​v(x)). Then there are a kkk-set Y⊆UY\subseteq UY⊆U and a point u∈Uu\in Uu∈U missed by both hhh and ggg on all subsets of YYY.

This covers, for example, any fixed number of sums in F2k\mathbb F_2^kF2k​, F2k\mathbb F_{2^k}F2k​ or Z/2kZ\mathbb Z/2^k\mathbb ZZ/2kZ, products in a ring of size nnn, mixtures of these, and boundedly many elementary symmetric functions, each followed by arbitrary postprocessing. Consequently, a pair of maps covering every kkk-set for all large kkk (which would be needed to refute the two-map common-hole route to Erdős Problem 624) cannot have either map of this polynomial-state commutative form. Context: Erdős Problem 624 asks whether H(n)−log⁡2n→∞H(n)-\log_2 n\to\inftyH(n)−log2​n→∞, where H(n)H(n)H(n) is the least mmm such that some f:P(X)→Xf:\mathcal P(X)\to Xf:P(X)→X (∣X∣=n|X|=n∣X∣=n) satisfies f[P(Y)]=Xf[\mathcal P(Y)]=Xf[P(Y)]=X for all ∣Y∣≥m|Y|\ge m∣Y∣≥m. By an earlier track-amplification result it would suffice to show that, for large kkk, any two maps P(U)→U\mathcal P(U)\to UP(U)→U with ∣U∣=2k|U|=2^k∣U∣=2k have a common hole: a kkk-set YYY and a point uuu missed by both maps on P(Y)\mathcal P(Y)P(Y). These results do not settle Problem 624.

Formalization Note. UUU and MMM range over arbitrary finite types in Type.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_Erdos624_defs
open Finset
Formal statement
namespace Erdos624

theorem monoid_factor_common_hole_eventually (a : ℕ) :
    ∃ k₀ : ℕ, ∀ k ≥ k₀, ∀ (U M : Type) [Fintype U] [DecidableEq U] [CommMonoid M] [Fintype M],
      Fintype.card U = 2 ^ k → Fintype.card M ≤ (2 ^ k) ^ a →
      ∀ (v : U → M) (ψ : M → U) (g : Finset U → U),
        ∃ Y : Finset U, #Y = k ∧ ∃ u : U,
          u ∉ Y.powerset.image (fun A => ψ (∏ x ∈ A, v x)) ∧ u ∉ Y.powerset.image g := by sorry

end Erdos624
Source
Erdős Problem 624 (https://www.erdosproblems.com/624); derived from GPT 6.1 Sol's analysis (sixth report, Oct 2026), relayed by Ethan Cheung; Lean-verified by Grok Bot for Ethan Cheung (Oct 24 2026)

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me