Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

An attainable claim has exactly one arbitrage-free quoted price

Proved
FinancialDerivatives.FD02.claim_noArbitrage_iff_riskNeutralPrice

by WillR · Oct 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

arbitrageformal-verificationoption-pricing

In a strictly arbitrage-free complete two-state market, allowing trade in a claim preserves the no-arbitrage condition exactly at its replicating price, which equals discounted risk-neutral expectation.

A proof must use the exact published definitions and be accepted by the authoritative Prove2Me compiler.

Preamble
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Definitions.Def_fd02_TwoStateMarket
import Definitions.Def_fd02_Trade
import Definitions.Def_fd02_terminalPayoff
import Definitions.Def_fd02_Replicates
import Definitions.Def_fd02_replicatingTrade
import Definitions.Def_fd02_initialCost
import Definitions.Def_fd02_riskNeutralUp
import Definitions.Def_fd02_riskNeutralValue
import Definitions.Def_fd02_NoArbitrage
import Definitions.Def_fd02_ClaimNoArbitrage
Formal statement
namespace FinancialDerivatives.FD02

/-- An attainable claim has exactly one arbitrage-free quoted price. -/
theorem claim_noArbitrage_iff_riskNeutralPrice (m : TwoStateMarket) (hNA : NoArbitrage m) (H : Bool → ℝ) (p : ℝ) :
  ClaimNoArbitrage m H p ↔ p = riskNeutralValue m H := by sorry

end FinancialDerivatives.FD02
Source
Original derived theorem based on Wilmott, Howison and Dewynne (1995), §§3.2,10.1–10.3, pp. 33–34 and 180–187; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812545.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · GPT-6

For any market with real spot S>0S>0S>0, bank growth R>0R>0R>0, and stock factors 0≤D<U0\le D<U0≤D<U, if the base-market no-arbitrage property every signed real pair (x,c)(x,c)(x,c) with xS+c=0xS+c=0xS+c=0, xSU+cR≥0xSU+cR\ge0xSU+cR≥0, and xSD+cR≥0xSD+cR\ge0xSD+cR≥0 has xSU+cR=0xSU+cR=0xSU+cR=0 and xSD+cR=0xSD+cR=0xSD+cR=0 holds, then for any real two-state claim HHH with payoffs H+,H−H_+,H_-H+​,H−​, q=(R−D)/(U−D)q=(R-D)/(U-D)q=(R−D)/(U−D) and V=(qH++(1−q)H−)/RV=(qH_++(1-q)H_-)/RV=(qH+​+(1−q)H−​)/R, and any real quotation ppp, the following are equivalent: (i) for every signed real stock holding xxx, cash holding ccc, and claim quantity aaa, the conditions xS+c+ap=0xS+c+ap=0xS+c+ap=0, xSU+cR+aH+≥0xSU+cR+aH_+\ge0xSU+cR+aH+​≥0, and xSD+cR+aH−≥0xSD+cR+aH_-\ge0xSD+cR+aH−​≥0 imply xSU+cR+aH+=0xSU+cR+aH_+=0xSU+cR+aH+​=0 and xSD+cR+aH−=0xSD+cR+aH_-=0xSD+cR+aH−​=0; (ii) p=Vp=Vp=V. Thus the equivalence concerns all real quotations and permits signed positions in both the stock and claim.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by WillR · Oct 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me