Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Periods of Reeb orbits on a star-shaped level are bounded away from zero

Proved
FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_period_lower_bound

by Mazecto · Oct 20, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

finite-energypseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R2n+2S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^{2n+2}S=H−1(1)⊂R2n+2 be a strictly star-shaped level. There is T0>0T_0>0T0​>0 such that T≥T0T\ge T_0T≥T0​ for every periodic Reeb orbit (x,T)(x,T)(x,T) on SSS.

Formalization Note Periods are not required to be minimal (ReebOrbit allows multiple covers), which does not affect the statement.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Setting
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Periods of Reeb orbits on a strictly star-shaped level are bounded away from `0`: there is
`T₀ > 0` with `T₀ ≤ T` for every periodic Reeb orbit `(x, T)` on `S`. -/
theorem exists_period_lower_bound {n : ℕ} (H : V n → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H) :
    ∃ T₀ : ℝ, 0 < T₀ ∧ ∀ P : ReebOrbit H, T₀ ≤ P.T := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
Standard fact for a compact contact-type hypersurface; stated in U. Hryniewicz, Systems of global surfaces of section for dynamically convex Reeb flows on the 3-sphere, J. Symplectic Geom. 12 (2014), arXiv:1105.2077, p. 26
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Read-back: FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_period_lower_bound

Ambient space. Fix a natural number nnn (including n=0n = 0n=0) and let V=R2(n+1)V = \mathbb{R}^{2(n+1)}V=R2(n+1), with coordinates indexed k=0,1,…,2n+1k = 0, 1, \dots, 2n+1k=0,1,…,2n+1. On VVV the code uses:

  • the linear map j0j_0j0​ given by (j0v)k=−vk+1(j_0 v)_k = -v_{k+1}(j0​v)k​=−vk+1​ when kkk is even and (j0v)k=vk−1(j_0 v)_k = v_{k-1}(j0​v)k​=vk−1​ when kkk is odd;
  • the Euclidean dot product ⟨u,v⟩=∑kukvk\langle u, v\rangle = \sum_k u_k v_k⟨u,v⟩=∑k​uk​vk​, the form ω0(u,v)=⟨j0u,v⟩\omega_0(u, v) = \langle j_0 u, v\rangleω0​(u,v)=⟨j0​u,v⟩, and the Liouville form λx(v)=12ω0(x,v)\lambda_x(v) = \tfrac12 \omega_0(x, v)λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v);
  • for H:V→RH : V \to \mathbb{R}H:V→R, the vector ∇H(x)\nabla H(x)∇H(x) with components (∇H(x))k=DH(x)(ek)(\nabla H(x))_k = DH(x)(e_k)(∇H(x))k​=DH(x)(ek​), where DH(x)DH(x)DH(x) is the Fréchet derivative (taken to be 000 at points where HHH is not differentiable), the Hamiltonian vector field XH(x)=j0∇H(x)X_H(x) = j_0 \nabla H(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x), and the energy surface S={x∈V:H(x)=1}S = \{x \in V : H(x) = 1\}S={x∈V:H(x)=1};
  • the "Reeb" field
R(x)=(λx(XH(x)))−1XH(x),R(x) = \big(\lambda_x(X_H(x))\big)^{-1} X_H(x),R(x)=(λx​(XH​(x)))−1XH​(x),

where the inverse of 000 is taken to be 000 (so R(x)=0R(x) = 0R(x)=0 wherever λx(XH(x))=0\lambda_x(X_H(x)) = 0λx​(XH​(x))=0).

Hypothesis. H:V→RH : V \to \mathbb{R}H:V→R satisfies the predicate "strictly star-shaped level", which by definition means all three of:

  1. HHH is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on all of VVV;
  2. for every u∈Vu \in Vu∈V with u≠0u \neq 0u=0 there is exactly one real rrr with r>0r > 0r>0 and H(ru)=1H(r u) = 1H(ru)=1;
  3. for every x∈Vx \in Vx∈V with H(x)=1H(x) = 1H(x)=1, DH(x)(x)>0DH(x)(x) > 0DH(x)(x)>0.

Reeb orbits. An object "Reeb orbit of HHH" consists of a map x:R→Vx : \mathbb{R} \to Vx:R→V and a real number TTT such that T>0T > 0T>0; x(τ)∈Sx(\tau) \in Sx(τ)∈S for all τ\tauτ; xxx is differentiable at every τ\tauτ with x′(τ)=R(x(τ))x'(\tau) = R(x(\tau))x′(τ)=R(x(τ)); and x(τ+T)=x(τ)x(\tau + T) = x(\tau)x(τ+T)=x(τ) for all τ\tauτ. Here TTT is any positive period of xxx, not necessarily the minimal one; nothing excludes constant maps xxx if RRR vanishes at a point of SSS (in which case every T>0T > 0T>0 is admissible).

Conclusion. There exists a real number T0>0T_0 > 0T0​>0 such that for every Reeb orbit (x,T)(x, T)(x,T) of HHH,

T0≤T.T_0 \le T.T0​≤T.

If HHH has no Reeb orbits, the conclusion holds with any T0>0T_0 > 0T0​>0.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me