Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Contractible H supplies bibundle structures

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P93.proposition_3_16

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let t:G→Ht:G\to Ht:G→H be a topological crossed module, with continuous action α:H→Aut⁡(G)\alpha:H\to\operatorname{Aut}(G)α:H→Aut(G). Thus t(α(h)g)=ht(g)h−1t(\alpha(h)g)=ht(g)h^{-1}t(α(h)g)=ht(g)h−1 and α(t(g))k=gkg−1\alpha(t(g))k=gkg^{-1}α(t(g))k=gkg−1. Put G1=ker⁡tG_1=\ker tG1​=kert and give both G/G1G/G_1G/G1​ and H/t(G)H/t(G)H/t(G) their quotient topologies. Assume their quotient projections admit continuous local sections. All actions, structure maps and isomorphisms below are continuous, all principal bundles are locally trivial, and a bispace has a nonempty principal homogeneous underlying right space.

Assume that HHH is contractible as an ordinary topological space. Let MMM be paracompact Hausdorff and let P→MP\to MP→M be any locally trivial principal GGG-bundle. Then there exists a continuous structure map

ψ:P→H,ψ(pg)=ψ(p)t(g),\psi:P\to H,\qquad \psi(pg)=\psi(p)t(g),ψ:P→H,ψ(pg)=ψ(p)t(g),

so that the given principal bundle admits an (H,G)(H,G)(H,G)-bibundle structure. The classifying context ensures numerability, and neither a prior structure map nor a classifying-map lift is assumed. Contractibility of HHH, not of GGG, is the required hypothesis.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P93
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P93

universe u

variable {G H : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
  [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H]

variable (C : CrossedModule G H)

/-- Proposition 3.16, PDF p.23. Contractibility is ordinary contractibility of H.
The conclusion supplies a continuous structure map on the given principal bundle;
no preassigned lift, section, or bibundle structure is assumed. -/
theorem proposition_3_16 {M P : Type u} [TopologicalSpace M] [ParacompactSpace M]
    [T2Space M] [TopologicalSpace P] [ContractibleSpace H]
    (R : PrincipalBundle G M P) :
    ∃ psi : C(P, H), ∀ p g, psi (R.right.act p g) = psi p * C.t g := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P93
Source
On the existence of bibundles, arXiv:1102.4388v2, PDF p. 23, Proposition 3.16
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let G,HG,HG,H be topological groups, and let CCC consist of a continuous homomorphism t:G→Ht:G\to Ht:G→H and a homomorphism α:H→Aut⁡(G)\alpha:H\to\operatorname{Aut}(G)α:H→Aut(G) whose evaluation is continuous, satisfying t(αh(g))=h t(g) h−1t(\alpha_h(g))=h\,t(g)\,h^{-1}t(αh​(g))=ht(g)h−1 and αt(g)(k)=gkg−1\alpha_{t(g)}(k)=gkg^{-1}αt(g)​(k)=gkg−1 for all h∈Hh\in Hh∈H and g,k∈Gg,k\in Gg,k∈G. Assume that each quotient map G→G/ker⁡tG\to G/\ker tG→G/kert and H→H/t(G)H\to H/t(G)H→H/t(G) admits continuous sections on open neighborhoods of every target point, with quotient equal to inclusion, and assume that the topological space HHH is contractible. Let MMM be any paracompact Hausdorff topological space, let PPP be any topological space, and let RRR be a principal GGG-bundle over MMM: it has a continuous right action p⋅gp\cdot gp⋅g satisfying p⋅1=pp\cdot1=pp⋅1=p and (p⋅g)⋅k=p⋅(gk)(p\cdot g)\cdot k=p\cdot(gk)(p⋅g)⋅k=p⋅(gk), a continuous projection π:P→M\pi:P\to Mπ:P→M satisfying π(p⋅g)=π(p)\pi(p\cdot g)=\pi(p)π(p⋅g)=π(p), and, around every m∈Mm\in Mm∈M, an open neighborhood UUU with a homeomorphism π−1(U)≅U×G\pi^{-1}(U)\cong U\times Gπ−1(U)≅U×G preserving the projection and carrying the action to right multiplication on the second factor. Then there exists a continuous map ψ:P→H\psi:P\to Hψ:P→H such that

ψ(p⋅g)=ψ(p) t(g)for every p∈P, g∈G.\psi(p\cdot g)=\psi(p)\,t(g) \qquad\text{for every }p\in P,\ g\in G.ψ(p⋅g)=ψ(p)t(g)for every p∈P, g∈G.

No uniqueness is asserted. The empty base is permitted; then PPP is necessarily empty and the equivariance condition is vacuous.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me