`BookProof.NavierStokesFlow.HermiteFarisLavine.normSq_hFun_le` (hκ : 0 ≤ κ) (X : ℕ → ℂ) (m : ℕ) : ‖hFun κ X m‖ ^ 2 ≤ 2 * shift2 (fun n => (ampSeq κ X n) ^ 2) m + 2 * (ampSeq...
ProvedBookProof.NavierStokesFlow.HermiteFarisLavine.normSq_hFun_letheoremstimepiece
Prove the following Lean 4 theorem from ChapterNavierStokesHermiteFarisLavine.
BookProof.NavierStokesFlow.HermiteFarisLavine.normSq_hFun_le (hκ : 0 ≤ κ) (X : ℕ → ℂ) (m : ℕ) : ‖hFun κ X m‖ ^ 2 ≤ 2 * shift2 (fun n => (ampSeq κ X n) ^ 2) m + 2 * (ampSeq κ X (m + 2)) ^ 2
Formalization note: Lean 4 identifier BookProof.NavierStokesFlow.HermiteFarisLavine.normSq_hFun_le.
Preamble
-- Generated from ChapterNavierStokesHermiteFarisLavine.lean — theorem BookProof.NavierStokesFlow.HermiteFarisLavine.normSq_hFun_le
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ChapterNavierStokesHermiteFarisLavine
import Definitions.Def_ChapterNavierStokesAffineFiberEsa
open BookProof.NavierStokesFlow
open BookProof.NavierStokesFlow.HermiteFarisLavine
open scoped ENNReal
open LpNat BookProof.FarisLavine IkebeKato
variable {κ : ℝ}
variable {x : maxDom (oscSymbol κ)}Formal statement
theorem BookProof.NavierStokesFlow.HermiteFarisLavine.normSq_hFun_le (hκ : 0 ≤ κ) (X : ℕ → ℂ) (m : ℕ) :
‖hFun κ X m‖ ^ 2
≤ 2 * shift2 (fun n => (ampSeq κ X n) ^ 2) m + 2 * (ampSeq κ X (m + 2)) ^ 2 := by sorry