Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

The spectral measure class is not closed under self-convolution

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P38.convolution_nonclosure

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

On R\mathbb RR, let λ\lambdaλ be ordinary Lebesgue measure. For positive measures, define σ⋆τ\sigma\star\tauσ⋆τ as the pushforward of σ×τ\sigma\times\tauσ×τ under addition, allowing extended masses. Let C\mathcal CC be the regular positive Borel measures with ∫(1+u2)−p dσ(u)<∞\int(1+u^2)^{-p}\,d\sigma(u)<\infty∫(1+u2)−pdσ(u)<∞ for some nonnegative integer ppp. Then

λ∈C,λ⋆λ∉C.\lambda\in\mathcal C,\qquad\lambda\star\lambda\notin\mathcal C.λ∈C,λ⋆λ∈/C.

Thus C\mathcal CC is not stable under self-convolution. The extended convolution measure exists; it is not locally finite and has infinite weighted mass, rather than being nonexistent as claimed in the source's stronger rhetoric.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P38
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P38

open MeasureTheory Filter

open scoped Topology ComplexConjugate ENNReal

/-- §11, PDF p.25: Lebesgue measure belongs to C, but its self-convolution does not.
The pushforward still exists as an extended measure, contrary to the source's
stronger “not a well defined Borel measure” rhetoric. -/
theorem convolution_nonclosure :
    InC (volume : Measure (SpectralDomain 1)) ∧
      ¬ InC (measureConvolution (volume : Measure (SpectralDomain 1)) volume) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P38

end
Source
Stochastic processes induced by singular operators, arXiv:1109.5273v1, PDF p. 25, §11, unnumbered: C is not closed under self-convolution
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let X=RFin⁡1X=\mathbb R^{\operatorname{Fin}1}X=RFin1 with its Euclidean structure, let λ\lambdaλ be Euclidean volume on XXX, and define λ∗λ\lambda*\lambdaλ∗λ to be the pushforward of the product measure λ⊗λ\lambda\otimes\lambdaλ⊗λ under (u,v)↦u+v(u,v)\mapsto u+v(u,v)↦u+v. Then λ\lambdaλ is regular and there exists a natural number ppp, possibly zero, such that

∫X(1+∥u∥2)−p dλ(u)<∞.\int_X(1+\|u\|^2)^{-p}\,d\lambda(u)<\infty.∫X​(1+∥u∥2)−pdλ(u)<∞.

At the same time, it is false that λ∗λ\lambda*\lambdaλ∗λ is regular and has such a finite weighted integral for some natural number: equivalently, either λ∗λ\lambda*\lambdaλ∗λ is not regular or

∀p∈N,∫X ⁣ ⁣−(1+∥u∥2)−p d(λ∗λ)(u)=+∞.\forall p\in\mathbb N,\qquad \int_X^{\!\!-}(1+\|u\|^2)^{-p}\,d(\lambda*\lambda)(u)=+\infty.∀p∈N,∫X−​(1+∥u∥2)−pd(λ∗λ)(u)=+∞.
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me