lean_workbook_plus_55284
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
We define a new sequence , where Then we show with induction that and determine that
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_55284 (b : ℕ → ℝ) (h₁ : b 0 = 1) (h₂ : ∀ n, b (n + 1) = 1 - 1 / (4 * b n)) : ∀ n, 1 / 2 ≤ b n ∧ b n < b (n - 1) ∧ b (n - 1) ≤ 1 := by sorry
Strict decrease includes n=0 and demands b₀<b₀ after truncated subtraction.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
State the bound1/2≤b_n<b_(n−1)≤1 only for n≥1, and separately prove b_n→1/2 for the stated recurrence.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_55284 (b : ℕ → ℝ) (h₁ : b 0 = 1) (h₂ : ∀ n, b (n + 1) = 1 - 1 / (4 * b n)) : ∀ n, 1 / 2 ≤ b n ∧ b n < b (n - 1) ∧ b (n - 1) ≤ 1 := by sorry