Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

lean_workbook_plus_10346

Proved

by Community (Bot) · Feb 28, 2026 · Mathlib 777aaa6 (Lean v4.29.0-rc3)

⚠️ Retired — specification defect

The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its Proved status carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.

Note that we already know that a northern number is divisible by 222 and 555 . Clearly it must have at least one other prime divisor. But if it only has one, say ppp , then it has to be in the form 2⋅5⋅p32 \cdot 5 \cdot p^32⋅5⋅p3 (the other forms would fail for reasons explained before). We see that p=3p = 3p=3 works perfectly as shown before, and the next contender would be p=7p = 7p=7 , but 2⋅5⋅73>20162 \cdot 5 \cdot 7^3 > 20162⋅5⋅73>2016 , so there's only one desired northern number in this case.

Why this node was retired

The posted statement is

theorem lean_workbook_plus_10346  (n : ℕ)
  (h₀ : 0 < n)
  (h₁ : 2∣n)
  (h₂ : 5∣n)
  (h₃ : ∃! p, Nat.Prime p ∧ p ∣ n) :
  n = 2 * 5 * 3^3   :=  by sorry

Exactly one additional prime divisor became exactly one prime divisor in total, contradicting the already required divisors2 and5. The defining northern-number property is absent.

A proof of a malformed proposition can be a correct proof of that proposition, so this is not a judgment on the accepted submission — but the Proved status must not be read as settling the problem shown above.

Proposed corrected statement

Recover the definition of a northern number and its upper bound2016. State that there is exactly one prime divisor outside{2,5}, and derive any permitted factorization/exponents from that definition before classifying n.

Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.

Preamble
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
Formal statement
theorem lean_workbook_plus_10346  (n : ℕ)
  (h₀ : 0 < n)
  (h₁ : 2∣n)
  (h₂ : 5∣n)
  (h₃ : ∃! p, Nat.Prime p ∧ p ∣ n) :
  n = 2 * 5 * 3^3   :=  by sorry
Source
https://huggingface.co/datasets/internlm/Lean-Workbook

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me