Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Degradability makes the entanglement consumption rate vanish

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P23.degradable_zero_ebit_rate

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let U:C2→Cb⊗CeU:\mathbb C^2\to\mathbb C^b\otimes\mathbb C^eU:C2→Cb⊗Ce be an isometry, so U†U=IU^\dagger U=IU†U=I, defining a memoryless channel to Bob and its fixed complementary channel to Eve. All binary inputs are uniform and entropies are in bits. At recursion depth n≥0n\ge0n≥0, let N=2nN=2^nN=2n and apply the coherent Arikan encoder GN=BNF⊗nG_N=B_NF^{\otimes n}GN​=BN​F⊗n, where F=(1011)F=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&0\\1&1\end{smallmatrix}\right)F=(11​01​). Amplitude synthesis retains previous bits and averages future bits; phase synthesis retains future bits and averages previous bits, with Bob's coherent copy register CNC^NCN retained. Write r(W)=∥ρ0ρ1∥1=F(W)r(W)=\|\sqrt{\rho_0}\sqrt{\rho_1}\|_1=\sqrt{F(W)}r(W)=∥ρ0​​ρ1​​∥1​=F(W)​ for the root fidelity of a binary channel WWW. Fix 0<β<1/20<\beta<1/20<β<1/2 and put tn=2−Nβt_n=2^{-N^\beta}tn​=2−Nβ. Let GA,GP,GEG_A,G_P,G_EGA​,GP​,GE​ be the respective amplitude-good, phase-good, and Eve-amplitude-good sets, with the strict rule r(WN(i))<tnr(W_N^{(i)})<t_nr(WN(i)​)<tn​. Write A=GA∩GP\mathcal A=G_A\cap G_PA=GA​∩GP​ and B=(GA∪GP)c\mathcal B=(G_A\cup G_P)^cB=(GA​∪GP​)c. Each set depends on nnn and β\betaβ.

Assume that there is a completely positive trace-preserving map D:B→ED:B\to ED:B→E with Nc=D∘N\mathcal N^c=D\circ\mathcal NNc=D∘N for the fixed extension UUU. Then

lim⁡n→∞∣B∣2n=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{|\mathcal B|}{2^n}=0.n→∞lim​2n∣B∣​=0.

This concerns asymptotic consumption per channel use; the finite-blocklength set B\mathcal BB need not be empty.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P23
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P23

open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate Matrix

open Filter

open QAlgorithms (Qubits)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P67 (IsDegradable)

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

/-- The consumed-ebit RATE vanishes for degradable channels; this is not a
finite-blocklength zero-consumption assertion (II, Appendix C, PDF pp.4,8–9). -/
theorem degradable_zero_ebit_rate {b e : ℕ} (U : Matrix (Fin b × Fin e) Bool ℂ)
    (hU : Uᴴ * U = 1) (hdeg : IsDegradable U)
    (beta : ℝ) (hbeta0 : 0 < beta) (hbeta1 : beta < 1 / 2) :
    Tendsto (fun n => indexRate (consumedSet U n beta)) atTop (nhds 0) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P23
Source
Quantum polar codes for arbitrary channels, arXiv:1201.2906v2, PDF p. 9, II and Appendix C
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For all natural numbers b,eb,eb,e, every complex matrix UUU with rows indexed by {0,…,b−1}×{0,…,e−1}\{0,\ldots,b-1\}\times\{0,\ldots,e-1\}{0,…,b−1}×{0,…,e−1} and Boolean columns satisfying U†U=I2U^\dagger U=I_2U†U=I2​, assume also that there exists a map DDD from b×bb\times bb×b complex matrices to e×ee\times ee×e complex matrices with a finite Kraus representation

D(X)=∑ℓ=0m−1KℓXKℓ†,∑ℓ=0m−1Kℓ†Kℓ=Ib,D(X)=\sum_{\ell=0}^{m-1}K_\ell X K_\ell^\dagger, \qquad \sum_{\ell=0}^{m-1}K_\ell^\dagger K_\ell=I_b,D(X)=ℓ=0∑m−1​Kℓ​XKℓ†​,ℓ=0∑m−1​Kℓ†​Kℓ​=Ib​,

such that, for every 2×22\times22×2 complex matrix ρ\rhoρ,

Tr⁡B(UρU†)=D ⁣(Tr⁡E(UρU†)).\operatorname{Tr}_{B}(U\rho U^\dagger) = D\!\left(\operatorname{Tr}_{E}(U\rho U^\dagger)\right).TrB​(UρU†)=D(TrE​(UρU†)).

For any real 0<β<120<\beta<\tfrac120<β<21​, define the following sets. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb Nn∈N, including zero, put N=2nN=2^nN=2n, identify bits with 0,10,10,1, and define

Grj(n)=1 ⁣{∀ 0≤k<n, ⌊j/2k⌋ mod 2≤⌊r/2n−1−k⌋ mod 2},pn(u)j=(∑r<NurGrj(n)) mod 2.G^{(n)}_{rj} = \mathbf1\!\left\{ \forall\,0\le k<n,\ \left\lfloor j/2^k\right\rfloor\bmod2 \le \left\lfloor r/2^{n-1-k}\right\rfloor\bmod2 \right\}, \qquad p_n(u)_j=\left(\sum_{r<N}u_rG^{(n)}_{rj}\right)\bmod2.Grj(n)​=1{∀0≤k<n, ⌊j/2k⌋mod2≤⌊r/2n−1−k⌋mod2},pn​(u)j​=(r<N∑​ur​Grj(n)​)mod2.

Set

vu(r,z)=∏j<NU(rj,zj),pn(u)j,wx(r,u,z)=2−N/2(−1)∑jxjujvu(r,z),v_u(\mathbf r,\mathbf z)=\prod_{j<N}U_{(r_j,z_j),p_n(u)_j}, \qquad w_x(\mathbf r,u,\mathbf z) = 2^{-N/2}(-1)^{\sum_jx_ju_j}v_u(\mathbf r,\mathbf z),vu​(r,z)=j<N∏​U(rj​,zj​),pn​(u)j​​,wx​(r,u,z)=2−N/2(−1)∑j​xj​uj​vu​(r,z),

and An(u)=Tr⁡z∣vu⟩⟨vu∣A_n(u)=\operatorname{Tr}_{\mathbf z}|v_u\rangle\langle v_u|An​(u)=Trz​∣vu​⟩⟨vu​∣, Qn(x)=Tr⁡z∣wx⟩⟨wx∣Q_n(x)=\operatorname{Tr}_{\mathbf z}|w_x\rangle\langle w_x|Qn​(x)=Trz​∣wx​⟩⟨wx​∣. Let mi−(u)m_i^-(u)mi−​(u) retain exactly the bits with j<ij<ij<i, setting the others to zero, and mi+(u)m_i^+(u)mi+​(u) retain exactly those with i<ji<ji<j, setting the others to zero. Put

An,i(a)=2−(N−1)∑u:ui=a∣mi−(u)⟩⟨mi−(u)∣⊗An(u),Pn,i(a)=2−(N−1)∑x:xi=a∣mi+(x)⟩⟨mi+(x)∣⊗Qn(x).A_{n,i}(a)=2^{-(N-1)}\sum_{u:u_i=a} |m_i^-(u)\rangle\langle m_i^-(u)|\otimes A_n(u), \quad P_{n,i}(a)=2^{-(N-1)}\sum_{x:x_i=a} |m_i^+(x)\rangle\langle m_i^+(x)|\otimes Q_n(x).An,i​(a)=2−(N−1)u:ui​=a∑​∣mi−​(u)⟩⟨mi−​(u)∣⊗An​(u),Pn,i​(a)=2−(N−1)x:xi​=a∑​∣mi+​(x)⟩⟨mi+​(x)∣⊗Qn​(x).

Writing Fr(K,L)=Re⁡tr⁡K L KF_{\mathrm r}(K,L)=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}\sqrt{\sqrt K\,L\,\sqrt K}Fr​(K,L)=RetrK​LK​​, with matrix square roots given by real continuous functional calculus, let

Cn={i<N:Fr(An,i(0),An,i(1))≥2−Nβ and Fr(Pn,i(0),Pn,i(1))≥2−Nβ}.\mathcal C_n = \left\{i<N: F_{\mathrm r}(A_{n,i}(0),A_{n,i}(1))\ge 2^{-N^\beta} \ \text{and}\ F_{\mathrm r}(P_{n,i}(0),P_{n,i}(1))\ge 2^{-N^\beta} \right\}.Cn​={i<N:Fr​(An,i​(0),An,i​(1))≥2−Nβ and Fr​(Pn,i​(0),Pn,i​(1))≥2−Nβ}.

Then

lim⁡n→∞∣Cn∣2n=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{|\mathcal C_n|}{2^n}=0.n→∞lim​2n∣Cn​∣​=0.

The hypotheses cannot hold if b=0b=0b=0 or e=0e=0e=0.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me