Proof of Proposition 4, p. 51 — the root of Equation (3) strictly increases from to bidders
ProvedRobustFPA.VarBid.root_increasingcomparative-staticsfirst-price-auctionp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1
Let , and . Write , , for the functions of the ClosedForms file with bidders. If solves Equation (3) for bidders on ,
and solves Equation (3) for bidders on , then
This is the comparative statics part of Proposition 4: the minimax loss bid shades less as competition grows.
Formalization Note. The paper differentiates the root in a real-valued via the implicit function theorem; the statement here is the integer comparison between and bidders, which is what "increases in the number of bidders" means. The increase is strict, as in the paper's . Same , , for both and .
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_RobustFPA_VarBid_ClosedForms
Formal statement
namespace RobustFPA.VarBid
theorem root_increasing (n : ℕ) (hn : 2 ≤ n) (τ L v : ℝ) (hτ0 : 0 < τ) (hτ1 : τ < 1) (hLv : L < v) (b b' : ℝ)
(hb : peakBid n τ L v ≤ b ∧ b ≤ v ∧ Equation3 n τ L v b)
(hb' : peakBid (n + 1) τ L v ≤ b' ∧ b' ≤ v ∧ Equation3 (n + 1) τ L v b') :
b < b' := by sorry
end RobustFPA.VarBid
Source
Kasberger & Schlag, Robust Bidding in First-Price Auctions, SSRN 3044438 (version of 3 Sep 2022), p. 51 (Appendix B.4, proof of Proposition 4: the minimax loss bid increases in n)
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.