Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proof of Proposition 4, p. 51 — the root of Equation (3) strictly increases from nnn to n+1n+1n+1 bidders

Proved
RobustFPA.VarBid.root_increasing

by mikedeng1 · Oct 20, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

comparative-staticsfirst-price-auctionp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Let n≥2n \ge 2n≥2, 0<τ<10 < \tau < 10<τ<1 and L<vL < vL<v. Write un+u^+_nun+​, un−u^-_nun−​, b~n\tilde b_nb~n​ for the functions of the ClosedForms file with nnn bidders. If bbb solves Equation (3) for nnn bidders on [max⁡{L,b~n},v][\max\{L,\tilde b_n\}, v][max{L,b~n​},v],

un+(max⁡{L,b~n})−un+(b)=un+(b)−un−(b),u^+_n(\max\{L,\tilde b_n\}) - u^+_n(b) = u^+_n(b) - u^-_n(b),un+​(max{L,b~n​})−un+​(b)=un+​(b)−un−​(b),

and b′b'b′ solves Equation (3) for n+1n+1n+1 bidders on [max⁡{L,b~n+1},v][\max\{L,\tilde b_{n+1}\}, v][max{L,b~n+1​},v], then

b<b′.b < b'.b<b′.

This is the comparative statics part of Proposition 4: the minimax loss bid shades less as competition grows.

Formalization Note. The paper differentiates the root E(b,n)=0E(b,n) = 0E(b,n)=0 in a real-valued nnn via the implicit function theorem; the statement here is the integer comparison between nnn and n+1n+1n+1 bidders, which is what "increases in the number of bidders" means. The increase is strict, as in the paper's ∂E/∂n<0\partial E/\partial n < 0∂E/∂n<0. Same τ\tauτ, LLL, vvv for both nnn and n+1n+1n+1.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_RobustFPA_VarBid_ClosedForms
Formal statement
namespace RobustFPA.VarBid

theorem root_increasing (n : ℕ) (hn : 2 ≤ n) (τ L v : ℝ) (hτ0 : 0 < τ) (hτ1 : τ < 1) (hLv : L < v) (b b' : ℝ)
    (hb : peakBid n τ L v ≤ b ∧ b ≤ v ∧ Equation3 n τ L v b)
    (hb' : peakBid (n + 1) τ L v ≤ b' ∧ b' ≤ v ∧ Equation3 (n + 1) τ L v b') :
    b < b' := by sorry

end RobustFPA.VarBid
Source
Kasberger & Schlag, Robust Bidding in First-Price Auctions, SSRN 3044438 (version of 3 Sep 2022), p. 51 (Appendix B.4, proof of Proposition 4: the minimax loss bid increases in n)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 20, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 20, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me