Proof of Proposition 4(i) — : the pooled SF wealth first-order dominates the SD wealth
ProvedMixFlex.Reliable.sf_cdf_le_sd_cdfflexibilitynewsvendorp2o-batch-p200ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1stochastic-dominance
In the perfectly reliable SD/SF model with nonnegative, measurable demand on a probability space, let be a dedicated investment and let the flexible network invest at the common cost . Then for every level ,
that is, the distribution function of the SF wealth lies below that of the SD wealth, and the SF wealth first-order stochastically dominates the SD wealth.
This is the step of the proof of Proposition 4 from which the expected-utility and CVaR comparisons follow.
Formalization Note The page states the inequality for the profits ; shifting both by the same constant does not change it, so it is stated for terminal wealth.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_MixFlex_Reliable_Model open MeasureTheory
Formal statement
namespace MixFlex.Reliable
theorem sf_cdf_le_sd_cdf (P : Params) (hP : P.Standing) {N : ℕ} {Ω : Type*}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] (μ : Measure Ω) (X : Ω → Fin N → ℝ) (hS : Setting μ X)
(K : Fin N → ℝ) (w : ℝ) :
μ.real {ω | wealthSF P X P.c (∑ n, K n) ω ≤ w} ≤ μ.real {ω | wealthSD P X K ω ≤ w} := by sorry
end MixFlex.Reliable
Source
Tomlin and Wang, On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks, Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(1), 2005, p. 53, Appendix A, proof of PROPOSITION 4(i), after (A-6)
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.