lean_workbook_plus_65913
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Let denote the probability of Yizheng winning given that is the number of points Yizheng has minus the number of points Jennifer has. Then: , , , , . Solve this linear system.
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_65913 (P : ℤ → ℚ) (h₀ : P 0 = 3/10 * P 1 + 7/10 * P (-1)) (h₁ : P 1 = 3/10 * P 2 + 7/10 * P 0) (h₂ : P (-1) = 3/10 * P 0 + 7/10 * P (-2)) (h₃ : P 2 = 1) (h₄ : P (-2) = 0) : P = fun n => (1/2)^(n+1) := by sorry
Five equations do not determine an entire function, and the invented geometric formula violates P(2)=1.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
State only P(−2)=0,P(−1)=27/580,P(0)=9/58,P(1)=237/580,P(2)=1; leave other indices unconstrained.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_65913 (P : ℤ → ℚ) (h₀ : P 0 = 3/10 * P 1 + 7/10 * P (-1)) (h₁ : P 1 = 3/10 * P 2 + 7/10 * P 0) (h₂ : P (-1) = 3/10 * P 0 + 7/10 * P (-2)) (h₃ : P 2 = 1) (h₄ : P (-2) = 0) : P = fun n => (1/2)^(n+1) := by sorry