Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Sec. IV A: the kernels (49)–(51), (54), (55) solve the non-interacting equations (44)–(48)

Proved
AKR2008.hybrid_noninteracting_mode_solution

by Lucas · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

mathematical-physicsquantum-gravity

Consider the non-interacting (g=0g=0g=0) two-dimensional Nordström model with a quantized massive scalar field of mass mmm, in the configuration-space-ensemble description of Sec. IV A, with the Gaussian ansatz for ScS^cSc, PcP^cPc, PqP^qPq. Throughout, kernels of Sec. IV A are written in the real orthonormal eigenbasis f(k)f^{(k)}f(k) of −∂x2-\partial_x^2−∂x2​ (eigenvalue k2k^2k2): a kernel Axy=∑kAkfx(k)fy(k)A_{xy}=\sum_k A_k f^{(k)}_x f^{(k)}_yAxy​=∑k​Ak​fx(k)​fy(k)​ is represented by its mode coefficient AkA_kAk​, so ∫dx AyxBxz↦AkBk\int dx\,A_{yx}B_{xz}\mapsto A_kB_k∫dxAyx​Bxz​↦Ak​Bk​, ∂z2δ(y−z)↦−k2\partial_z^2\delta(y-z)\mapsto -k^2∂z2​δ(y−z)↦−k2 and ∫dx Axx↦∑kAk\int dx\,A_{xx}\mapsto\sum_k A_k∫dxAxx​↦∑k​Ak​.

Let {ki}i∈ι\{k_i\}_{i\in\iota}{ki​}i∈ι​ be a finite family of mode wave numbers, τi,wi\tau_i, w_iτi​,wi​ arbitrary real constants, and ttt a time with cos⁡(kit)≠0\cos(k_it)\ne0cos(ki​t)=0 for all iii. Put Fi(t)=−kitan⁡(kit)F_i(t)=-k_i\tan(k_it)Fi​(t)=−ki​tan(ki​t), Gi=ki2+m2G_i=\sqrt{k_i^2+m^2}Gi​=ki2​+m2​, Ki(t)=τi/cos⁡2(kit)K_i(t)=\tau_i/\cos^2(k_it)Ki​(t)=τi​/cos2(ki​t), βi(t)=wicos⁡(kit)\beta_i(t)=w_i\cos(k_it)βi​(t)=wi​cos(ki​t) and Nc(t)=1/∏icos⁡(kit)N^c(t)=1/\prod_i\cos(k_it)Nc(t)=1/∏i​cos(ki​t). Then at time ttt:

  1. Eq. (44): F˙i+Fi2+ki2=0\dot F_i + F_i^2 + k_i^2 = 0F˙i​+Fi2​+ki2​=0 for every iii;
  2. Eq. (45): −Gi2+(ki2+m2)=0-G_i^2 + (k_i^2+m^2) = 0−Gi2​+(ki2​+m2)=0 for every iii;
  3. Eq. (46):
N˙cNc−12 ddt(∑iβiKiβi)+∑iFi=0;\frac{\dot N^c}{N^c} - \frac12\,\frac{d}{dt}\Bigl(\sum_i \beta_i K_i \beta_i\Bigr) + \sum_i F_i = 0;NcN˙c​−21​dtd​(i∑​βi​Ki​βi​)+i∑​Fi​=0;
  1. Eq. (47): ddt(βiKi)+βiKiFi=0\dfrac{d}{dt}(\beta_iK_i) + \beta_iK_iF_i = 0dtd​(βi​Ki​)+βi​Ki​Fi​=0 for every iii;
  2. Eq. (48): −12K˙i−KiFi=0-\tfrac12\dot K_i - K_iF_i = 0−21​K˙i​−Ki​Fi​=0 for every iii.

This is the paper's explicit solution of the uncoupled classical-quantum system: the classical gravitational-wave sector is a field-theoretic analogue of a classical oscillator ensemble, and the quantum sector is a one-particle Schrödinger wave functional. It is the g=0g=0g=0 starting point of the first-order hybrid solution of Sec. IV B.

Formalization Note The kernel equations are stated mode by mode in the eigenbasis, and the family of modes is finite (a truncation). Eq. (43), which involves the divergent zero-point term ∫dx Gxx\int dx\,G_{xx}∫dxGxx​, and Eq. (53) are not part of this statement.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_AKR2008_HybridDefs
Formal statement
namespace AKR2008

theorem hybrid_noninteracting_mode_solution {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (k τ w : ι → ℝ) (m t : ℝ)
    (hcos : ∀ i, Real.cos (k i * t) ≠ 0) :
    (∀ i, deriv (fun s => hybridModeF (k i) s) t + hybridModeF (k i) t ^ 2 + k i ^ 2 = 0) ∧
    (∀ i, -hybridModeG m (k i) ^ 2 + (k i ^ 2 + m ^ 2) = 0) ∧
    (deriv (fun s => hybridNc k s) t / hybridNc k t
        - (1 / 2) * deriv (fun s => ∑ i, hybridModeBeta (w i) (k i) s *
            hybridModeK (τ i) (k i) s * hybridModeBeta (w i) (k i) s) t
        + ∑ i, hybridModeF (k i) t = 0) ∧
    (∀ i, deriv (fun s => hybridModeBeta (w i) (k i) s * hybridModeK (τ i) (k i) s) t
        + hybridModeBeta (w i) (k i) t * hybridModeK (τ i) (k i) t * hybridModeF (k i) t = 0) ∧
    (∀ i, -(1 / 2) * deriv (fun s => hybridModeK (τ i) (k i) s) t
        - hybridModeK (τ i) (k i) t * hybridModeF (k i) t = 0) := by sorry

end AKR2008
Source
M. Albers, C. Kiefer, M. Reginatto, Measurement analysis and quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064051 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.064051, p. 064051-10, Sec. IV A, Eqs. (44)–(51), (54), (55)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic)

Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statement, not by a blind auditor with a fresh context. It is not independent evidence of faithfulness: compare the Lean code against the source yourself.

For every finite type ι\iotaι, all real families k=(ki)i∈ιk=(k_i)_{i\in\iota}k=(ki​)i∈ι​, τ=(τi)\tau=(\tau_i)τ=(τi​), w=(wi)w=(w_i)w=(wi​), all real mmm and ttt, assuming cos⁡(kit)≠0\cos(k_it)\ne0cos(ki​t)=0 for every i∈ιi\in\iotai∈ι, the following five statements hold simultaneously (with FFF, GGG, KKK, β\betaβ, NcN^cNc the functions hybridModeF\mathrm{hybridModeF}hybridModeF, hybridModeG\mathrm{hybridModeG}hybridModeG, hybridModeK\mathrm{hybridModeK}hybridModeK, hybridModeBeta\mathrm{hybridModeBeta}hybridModeBeta, hybridNc\mathrm{hybridNc}hybridNc defined as −ktan⁡(kt)-k\tan(kt)−ktan(kt), k2+m2\sqrt{k^2+m^2}k2+m2​, τk/cos⁡2(kt)\tau_k/\cos^2(kt)τk​/cos2(kt), wkcos⁡(kt)w_k\cos(kt)wk​cos(kt), 1/∏icos⁡(kit)1/\prod_i\cos(k_it)1/∏i​cos(ki​t)):

  1. for all iii: dds[−kitan⁡(kis)]s=t+ki2tan⁡2(kit)+ki2=0\frac{d}{ds}\bigl[-k_i\tan(k_is)\bigr]_{s=t} + k_i^2\tan^2(k_it) + k_i^2 = 0dsd​[−ki​tan(ki​s)]s=t​+ki2​tan2(ki​t)+ki2​=0;
  2. for all iii: −(ki2+m2)2+(ki2+m2)=0-\bigl(\sqrt{k_i^2+m^2}\bigr)^2 + (k_i^2+m^2) = 0−(ki2​+m2​)2+(ki2​+m2)=0;
  3. (Nc)′(t)Nc(t)−12 dds[∑iβi(s)Ki(s)βi(s)]s=t+∑iFi(t)=0\dfrac{(N^c)'(t)}{N^c(t)} - \dfrac12\,\dfrac{d}{ds}\Bigl[\sum_i \beta_i(s)K_i(s)\beta_i(s)\Bigr]_{s=t} + \sum_i F_i(t) = 0Nc(t)(Nc)′(t)​−21​dsd​[∑i​βi​(s)Ki​(s)βi​(s)]s=t​+∑i​Fi​(t)=0, where βi(s)=wicos⁡(kis)\beta_i(s)=w_i\cos(k_is)βi​(s)=wi​cos(ki​s), Ki(s)=τi/cos⁡2(kis)K_i(s)=\tau_i/\cos^2(k_is)Ki​(s)=τi​/cos2(ki​s);
  4. for all iii: dds[βi(s)Ki(s)]s=t+βi(t)Ki(t)Fi(t)=0\frac{d}{ds}\bigl[\beta_i(s)K_i(s)\bigr]_{s=t} + \beta_i(t)K_i(t)F_i(t) = 0dsd​[βi​(s)Ki​(s)]s=t​+βi​(t)Ki​(t)Fi​(t)=0;
  5. for all iii: −12 Ki′(t)−Ki(t)Fi(t)=0-\tfrac12\,K_i'(t) - K_i(t)F_i(t) = 0−21​Ki′​(t)−Ki​(t)Fi​(t)=0.

Derivatives are Lean's deriv (which is 000 at points of non-differentiability; under the cosine hypothesis all functions involved are differentiable at ttt). The index type may be empty, in which case the three "for all iii" clauses are vacuous and clause 3 reads 0/1−0+0=00/1 - 0 + 0 = 00/1−0+0=0. There are no sign or positivity assumptions on kik_iki​, mmm, τi\tau_iτi​, wiw_iwi​; ki=0k_i=0ki​=0 is allowed.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me