lean_workbook_plus_62097
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Let such that . Prove that: .
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_62097 : ∀ a b c : ℝ, a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ∧ c > 0 ∧ a + b + c = 1 → a^3 + b^3 + c^3 + 3 * a * b + 3 * b * c + 3 * c * a ≠ 0 ∧ a^3 + b^3 + c^3 + 3 * a * b + 3 * b * c + 3 * c * a = 1 + 3 * a * b * c → a^3 + b^3 + c^3 + 3 * a * b + 3 * b * c + 3 * c * a / (1 + 3 * a * b * c) = 1 := by sorry
Only the last term3ca was divided by1+3abc, instead of the whole numerator.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Parenthesize the full numerator and prove(a³+b³+c³+3ab+3bc+3ca)/(1+3abc)=1 under a,b,c>0 and a+b+c=1.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_62097 : ∀ a b c : ℝ, a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ∧ c > 0 ∧ a + b + c = 1 → a^3 + b^3 + c^3 + 3 * a * b + 3 * b * c + 3 * c * a ≠ 0 ∧ a^3 + b^3 + c^3 + 3 * a * b + 3 * b * c + 3 * c * a = 1 + 3 * a * b * c → a^3 + b^3 + c^3 + 3 * a * b + 3 * b * c + 3 * c * a / (1 + 3 * a * b * c) = 1 := by sorry