Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Step (iii): the best layer has welfare at least OPT*/(3k)

Proved
ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding.best_layer_bound

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

approximation-algorithmscombinatorial-auctionsp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1subadditive-valuations

Let v1,…,vnv_1,\dots,v_nv1​,…,vn​ be normalized, complement-free valuations, let xxx be any point with LP value L=∑i,Sxi,Svi(S)L=\sum_{i,S}x_{i,S}v_i(S)L=∑i,S​xi,S​vi​(S), and let k≥1k\ge1k≥1. Let σ=(S1,…,Sn)\sigma=(S_1,\dots,S_n)σ=(S1​,…,Sn​) be a preallocation in which every item appears in at most kkk bundles and

∑ivi(Si)≥13L.\sum_i v_i(S_i)\ge \tfrac13 L.i∑​vi​(Si​)≥31​L.

If rrr with 1≤r≤k1\le r\le k1≤r≤k maximizes ∑ivi(Sir)\sum_i v_i(S_i^r)∑i​vi​(Sir​) over 1≤r≤k1\le r\le k1≤r≤k, then

∑ivi(Sir) ≥ L3k.\sum_i v_i(S_i^r)\ \ge\ \frac{L}{3k}.i∑​vi​(Sir​) ≥ 3kL​.

With xxx optimal, L=OPT∗L=OPT^*L=OPT∗, and this is the bound ∑ivi(Sir)≥OPT∗/(3k)\sum_i v_i(S^r_i)\ge OPT^*/(3k)∑i​vi​(Sir​)≥OPT∗/(3k) of step (iii) of the proof of Theorem 3.1: the best layer is a feasible allocation within a factor 3k3k3k of the fractional optimum.

Formalization Note The statement holds for any xxx whose value LLL satisfies the displayed hypothesis; optimality of xxx is not needed for this step.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_Auction
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_LP
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_Algorithm
Formal statement
namespace ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding

theorem best_layer_bound {n m : ℕ} (v : Fin n → Finset (Fin m) → ℝ)
    (hnorm : ∀ i, IsNormalized (v i)) (hsub : ∀ i, IsSubadditive (v i))
    (x : Fin n → Finset (Fin m) → ℝ) (σ : Fin n → Finset (Fin m)) (k : ℕ) (hk : 1 ≤ k)
    (hcount : ∀ j, count σ j ≤ k) (hval : lpValue v x / 3 ≤ welfare v σ)
    (r : ℕ) (hr : IsBestLayer v σ k r) :
    lpValue v x / (3 * k) ≤ welfare v (fun i => layer σ i r) := by sorry

end ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding
Source
Dobzinski, Nisan, Schapira, Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions with Complement-Free Bidders, Math. Oper. Res. 35(1), 2010, p. 6, §3.1, proof of Theorem 3.1, step (iii)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me