Sharpness of the archimedean degree bound: solvable
ProvedCollapsibleCubics.exists_angles_iff_pi_div_psi_leThe archimedean threshold for one-step collapsibility, as a sharp equivalence.
Fix and an integer . Consider the system
in unknowns and , subject to for all and for all . The assertion is that this system is solvable if and only if .
The statement is pure real analysis and needs no definition beyond . The background below explains where the system comes from and why the equivalence is the natural thing to want.
Background: where the system comes from
Call split if , its leading coefficient is a nonzero rational, and all of its roots are rational — equivalently with and every . An algebraic number is collapsible if for some split . These are the notions in this mission's definition bundle CollapsibleCubics_basic, and the mission's headline conjecture CollapsibleCubics.cubic_collapsible asserts that every algebraic number of degree is collapsible.
Let be irreducible with negative discriminant, so has one real root and a pair of complex conjugate roots. Write
so the real root is and the complex roots are ; put and, in the normalisation ,
Suppose is split with for a root of . Since has rational coefficients and is rational, takes the same value at every conjugate of ; comparing and gives
As ranges over , the point traces a fixed circle through and , with polar equation . Substituting , the modulus of becomes the product equation and its argument becomes the sum equation, the integer being the winding count that the argument is only defined up to. Here , the constraint is automatic, and corresponds to , that is to , which is not an admissible root.
So the system is exactly the archimedean shadow of one-step collapsibility, with every arithmetic condition on the discarded. The integer is quantified existentially and is not fixed in advance: that is what makes the forward direction a statement about every split , not merely those of one winding number.
What is known and what is open
The forward direction is the archimedean lower bound on the degree, and it is known. It is the analytic core of this mission's proved milestone CollapsibleCubics.pi_div_psi_le_natDegree, which concludes for every split collapsing a root of . That milestone is already proved on this platform, but the analytic statement here is not itself a published node, so this direction must be proved again as part of the equivalence. It is the shorter half.
The converse is the open content. It asserts that the bound is sharp: at every the system really is solvable, so no further archimedean obstruction exists at any degree. This direction does not appear in the source literature and is not known to be machine-checked anywhere.
Two things to be aware of
The hypothesis is essential, not decoration. As noted above, means , that is a root at infinity, which is not a root at all. Dropping it makes the forward direction false — the degenerate configuration with every and satisfies both equations for every — and on the converse side it would allow a construction that yields fewer than genuine roots, which does not establish sharpness.
This does not settle collapsibility. The supplied by the converse correspond to real , not rational ones. The equivalence closes the archimedean side of the one-step problem completely, and thereby isolates the whole remaining difficulty as arithmetic; it does not bear on CollapsibleCubics.cubic_collapsible in either direction.
import Mathlib
namespace CollapsibleCubics
theorem exists_angles_iff_pi_div_psi_le {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (ψ : ℝ)
(hψ : ψ ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (Real.pi / 2)) :
(∃ (θ : Fin n → ℝ) (k : ℤ),
(∀ i, θ i ∈ Set.Ioo (-(Real.pi / 2)) (Real.pi / 2)) ∧
(∀ i, θ i ≠ -ψ) ∧
(∏ i, Real.cos (θ i)) = (Real.cos ψ) ^ n ∧
(∑ i, θ i) = 2 * Real.pi * k - n * ψ) ↔
Real.pi / ψ ≤ n := by sorry
end CollapsibleCubics